The Telangana High Court dismissed an appeal filed by an insurance company challenging the Compensation Tribunal's award. The court, finding no infirmity in the lower order, confirmed the decree and dismissed the appeal without costs.
The appeal was dismissed and the decree of the lower Tribunal was confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI
M.A.C.M.A. NO: 102 OF 2009
Appeal under Section I73 of M.V.Act, against the JudgmenV decree/ order in OP No.1043/2003 dated 2110912005 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- Additional lvletropolitan Sessions Judge, for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case -cum-Additional Family Court-cum- XXlll Additional Chief Judge, Red Hills, Nampally, at Hyderabad.
Between:
The New lndia Assurance Company Limited, rep., by its Divisional Manager 4th Floor, Alkarim Trade Centre, Ranigunj, Secunderabad.
...APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT NO.2
AND
....Respondents / Petitioners
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.1
MACMAMP. NO:'19'13 OF 2006
Petition under Section 15'1 of CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings including withdrawal of amounts in deposit amount made in pursuance of OP.No.1043 of 2003 dated 21-09-2005 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast case cum Additional Family Court cum XXlll Additional Chief Judge, Red Hills, Nampally at Hyderabad pending disposal of MACMA.
MACMAMP. NO: 8007 OF 2008
Petition under {,ection 151 CPC praying that in the crrr;umstances stated in the affidavit filed there ruith, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/ Respondent No.'l hr rein to withdraw her entire balance share amount of Rs.86,4651 with propc rtionate costs
For the Appellant : Sl ll P.HARINATH GUPTA, Advocate (SC lor lnsurance Co. Ltd., )
For the Respondent llo.'t : SRI M.VIJAY REDDY, Advocate
For the Respondent lJo.2 : SRI G.PRASANNA ANJANEYULU, Advocate
The Court delivered th: following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
M.A.C.M.A.No.1O2 of 2009
JUDGMENT:
2
GSD, J MACMA llo.l02 of2009
grievous head injuries. White he was being shiftel to Gandhi Hospital, thejeceased succumbed to the injuries. Since the accident occur red due to the rash and negtigent driving of the driver of the rffending bus, the claimants fited afcresaid O.P. against respordent Nos.1 and 2, who are the owner and insurer of the aforesa d bus, respectivety.
GSD, J MACMA No.102 of 2009
1
,/t
-)
date of reatization payabte by respondents 1 and 2 jointty and severatly. Aggrieved thereby, the appettant-lnsurance Company has fited this appeat.
4
GSD, J MACMA l,to.l02 of 2009
dismissed.
Pendin I miscettaneous applications, if any, shatt
stand closed.
Sd/-K.SAILESHI DE:PUTY BEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,./\ .-Qf r-l \1c 1tt-- SECTION OFFTCER To 1 The Chairmar L, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.-cum- Additional Metropolitan S, )ssions Judge, for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case -cum-Adr litional Family Court-cum- XXlll Additionrrl Chief Judge, Red Hills, Nampally at Hyderabad. (with records) 2 One CC to Sri l'.Harinath Gupta, Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to Sri l/.Vijay Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4 One CC to Sriti.Prasanna Anjaneyulu, Advocate [OPUC t Two CD Copie:, 6 One Spare Co,y Kj
HIGH COURT
DATED:2110312022
JUDGMENT
MACMA.No.102 of 1009
DISMISSING THE I/IACMA.
1
frf4
)
7 D
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI
M.A.C.M.A. NO: 102 OF 2009
Between:
The New India Assurance Company Limited, rep., by its Divisional N4anager 4th Floor, Alkarim Trade Centre, Ranigunj, Secunderabad.
...APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT NO.2
AND
..Respondents / Petitioners
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.1
Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and decree of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case- cum-Additional Family Court-cum- XXlll Additional Chief Judge, Red Hills, Nampally, at Hyderabad dated 2110912005 in OP No.1 043/2003.
This Appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the Memorandum of Appeal, the order of the Lower Court and the material papers in the case, and upon heaiing the arguments of Sri P.Harinath Gupta, (SC for lnsurance Co. Ltd.,) for the appellant and of Sri G.Prasanna Anjaneyulu, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
Decree: This Court doth Order and decree that the decree of the Lower Court be and hereby is confirmed and this Appeal, is dismissed and this Court doth further Order and decree that there be no Order as to costs in this Appeal.
Sd/-K.SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE copyil .,(tl,l) <sup>tf /rz SECTIoN oFFICER
To
-k
HIGH COURT
OATED:2110312022
DECREE
MACMA.No.102 of 2009
DISMISSING THE VIACMA.
0
? I
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.
The New India Assurance Company Limited, rep. by its Divisional Manager
Smt. A. Chandrakala
Smt. A. Veeramma
R.B.Kota Reddy
G Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
