Dismissed

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist

Telangana HC11 Jul 2022ITTA/420/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed before the Telangana High Court against an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal order was admitted. The respondent cited a settlement pursuant to the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and full payment of dues. The court accepted the settlement as ground for withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.

What did the court decide?

1. Appeal dismissed on withdrawal. 2. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Hyd Menzies Air… — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

)

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶7

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 420 OF 2017

¶8

Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 06-10-2016 in l.T.A. No. 422 lhydl2015 on the file of the Court of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad^"B' Bench, Hyderabad , Assessment Year 2010-2011 preferred against the order dated 23-02-2015 in lT.A.No. 0148lAC-2(2) /ClT (A) -2 12012-13 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 2 (2) , Hyderabad dated 3'1-01-2013ⁱⁿ PAN /GlR No. AACCC961 1N

¶9

Between:

¶10

Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax -2 , Hyderabad

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

M/s. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo [P]^Ltd., ,^{Air Cargo Terminal, Rajiv Gandhi} lnternational Airport, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K MAMATA CHOUDARY

¶16

S.C FOR INCOME-TAX DEPT

¶17

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. CHALLA GUNARANJAN

¶18

The Court delivered the following: Judgment

¶19

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYAN AND

¶20

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶21

ITTA No.42O of 2OL7

¶22

JUDGMENT: eer thc Hon,bte the Chief Justice Ujjat Bhugotl)

¶23

Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appearing for the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶24

This appeal has been filed against the order dated O6.LO.2O|6 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ,8,, Hyderabad Bench Hyderabad in

¶25

I.T.A.No.422 /Hyd/2015 for the assessment year 2010-11.

¶26

The appeal lr,as admitted for hearing on IO.OZ.2OI7.

¶27

Today learned counsel for the appellant submits that on an application liled by the respondent under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has been settled between the parties follorving which fuli and final

¶28

¶29

settlemellt dues^{have been paid by therespondent'}

¶30

Therefore, appellant^{would like to withdraw the appeal'}

¶31

In view of^{the above, this appeal is dismissed on} withdrawal.

¶32

Miscellaneous applications^{pending, ifany, shall} stand closed.^{However, thcre shallbe no orderas to costs'}

¶33

¶34

SD/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// .. 4P1+.., ' SECTTON OFFICER

¶35

¶36

The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad "B" Bench, Hyderabad.

¶37

The Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad

¶38

The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 2 (2) , Hyderabad

¶39

One CC to Ms. K MAMATA CHOUDARY, S.C for lncome -tax Dept [OPUC]

¶40

One CC to Mr. CHALLA GUNARANJAN Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

Two CD Copies

¶42

One Spare Copy

bs \ff\

HIGH COURT

DATED:1110712022

JUDGMENT

ITTA.No.420 of 2017

z /\ i .l::
?)e
k .il.
$
ooJ [ [ riir la:l
{.
\ .iL
r,i1

¶49

DISMISSING THtl I,fTA AS WITHDRAWN.

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Chandra Sheker Reddy Vs State Bank of India

M/s. Gulf Oil Lubricants India Ltd. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s. Talwar Auto Garages Private Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St), And 4 Others

Vallurupalli Tarakeswar and another Vs Canara Bank and 3 others

M/s.Polepally Solar Parks Private Limited Vs The National Faceless Assessment Centre

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd Vs M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.R.Dist