Dismissed

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.R.Dist

Telangana HC11 Jul 2022ITTA/404/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Hyderabad Bench dismissed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as withdrawn by the appellant. The withdrawal was based on a settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Pending applications were closed without order for costs.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications closed. No order as to costs.

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd Vs M/S. Hyderabad Menzies… — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

IVONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF^JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL^BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI^NANDA

¶5

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL^{NO: 404 OF 2017}

¶6

Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax^{Act, 1961 against order} dated 06-10-2016 in l.T.A. No. 423 I HYD|2O15^{on the file of the Court of the} lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad^{'8" Bench, Hyderabad} ,^Assessment Year 2O11-12 prefered against the order dated^{23-05-2015in lT-A.No.O426|DC-} 2(3llcfi (A)-2t2013-14 on the file of the^{Commissionerof lncomeTax( Appeals} )- 2, Hyderabad^preferred against the order^{of Deputy Commissionerof lncomeTax} Ctcle2(2), Hyderabad dated 08-02-2014^{in PAN/GlR No. AACCC9611N}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax-2,^Hyderabad

¶9

...APPELLANT/Respondent

¶10

AND

¶11

tvl/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air^{Cargo (P)} Ltd.,^{Air Cargo TerminalRall'19qlO-ni} lnternaiional Airport, ShamshabaU, R.R.District.^{...RESPONDENT/Appellant}

¶12

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K MAMATA^CHOUDARY

¶13

S.C for lncome tax Dept

¶14

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CHALLA GUNARANJAN

¶15

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:

¶16

¶17

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BIIIIYAN AND

¶18

THE HON'BLE MRS JI,TSTICE ST'REPALLI NANDA

¶19

ITTA No.4O4 of 2OL7

¶20

JUDGMENT: 1'er ihe Hon bte the (:tuef Justice ILJat Bhuaan)

¶21

Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, learned Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department appearing for the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranj an, learned counsel for the respondent

¶22

This appeal has been Iiled against the order dated 06.10.2016 passed by thc Income Tax Appellate Tribuna-I, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad 1n I.T.A.No.a23lH1,d/2015 ft>r the assessment year 20l1-12.

¶23

The appeal u'as admitted for hearing on lO.O7.2Ol7.

¶24

Toda.r, learned counsel for the appellant submits that on an applicatior-r filed b,r' the respondent under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishrvas Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has been settled betu'een thc partics lollora,ing w,hich full and llnal

¶25

¶26

¶27

settlement dues have been paid by the respondent.

¶28

Therefore, appellant would like to withdraw the appeal.

¶29

in view of the above, this appeal is dismissed on withdrarva l.

¶30

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shatl

¶31

stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

¶33

//TRUE COPY//

¶34

SD/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JIONT STRAR

¶35

SECTI FFICER

¶36

¶37

The lncome Tax Appellate Triqunal Hyderabad "B" Bench, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad^' 3. The Deputy_ go.r.nTl99igngr _of lncome Tax iircte 2 (4 , Hyderabad 4. One CC to Ms. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY,. S,C FOR iNCOiviE 6ept[OpUC]

¶38

-5.^{One CC to Mr.} CHALLA GUNARANJAN Advocate topucl 6. Trvo CD Copies

¶39

One Sparc Copy

¶40

One Spare Copy

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 110712022

SIAT€
1
I
I
v7-o
lo,J [B sEP $n i:

¶45

ORDER

¶46

l-l'TA.No.404 of 2017

¶47

DISMISSINC THE ITTA AS WII-III)RAWN

¶48

(0
w
\l
;

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.R.Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.R.Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Chandra Sheker Reddy Vs State Bank of India

M/s. Gulf Oil Lubricants India Ltd. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s. Talwar Auto Garages Private Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St), And 4 Others

Vallurupalli Tarakeswar and another Vs Canara Bank and 3 others

M/s.Polepally Solar Parks Private Limited Vs The National Faceless Assessment Centre

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist