Dayaragula Padma Vs Dyarangula Venkata Swamy

¶1

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

¶2

I.A.No.1 of 2022

¶3

in/and

¶4

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.7 OF 2016

¶5

COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Dr.SA,J)

¶6

This Family Court Appeal, under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is filed by the appellant/wife, aggrieved by the order, dated 20.11.2015 passed in O.P.No.167 of 2013 by the Family Court, Nizamabad, whereby the petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage, was allowed dissolving the marriage between the appellant/wife and respondent/husband, which was solemnised on 22.01.2007.

¶7

Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the record.

¶8

On 29.04.2022, both the parties have appeared before this Court and submitted that they are living together and they intend to file a joint memo to that effect and seek appropriate order. I.A.No.1 of 2022 is filed, wherein both the parties have stated that they are living together and discharging their marital

¶9

2

¶10

obligations and requested this Court to set aside the impugned order dated 20.11.2015 passed in O.P.No.167 of 2013 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Nizamabad, wherein the marriage between the parties was dissolved.

¶11

Since both the parties are living together, as they have compromised the subject matter, the impugned order and decree, dated 20.11.2015 is liable to be set aside.

¶12

Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2022 is allowed. Consequently,

¶13

the Family Court Appeal is allowed setting aside the impugned order and decree, dated 20.11.2015 passed in O.P.No.167 of 2013 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Nizamabad.

¶14

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶15

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶16

____________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J

¶17

__________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J

¶18

Date: 10.06.2022 ssp

Dayaragula Padma v. Dyarangula Venkata Swamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dayaragula Padma v. Dyarangula Venkata Swamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chakali Shekar , Shekaiah Vs State of Telangana

Syed Abdul Masi Vs The State of Telangana

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Bilkuis Sultana

Zaddu Sudhakar Vs The State of Telangana

P. Supraja Vs P. Kiran Kumar

Nune Sharadha Vs Nune Ashok