The High Court of Telangana dismissed the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 as infructuous because counsel for both parties submitted that the petition had become so due to preceding circumstances.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N/ONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6236 0F 2016
Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated,31.'10.2016 passed in l.A. No. 41 of 2015 in R.C. No. 318 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Il Additional Rent Controller, at Hyderabad.
Between:
l,4r. Dinesh Kumar Loya, S/o. l,4ukund Dasji Loya, Aged [4ajor, Occ. Business, Mulgi No. 4-5- 42813, Balajr lt4arl'et. Badi Chowdi, Sultan Bazaar, Hyderabad .
Petitioner
AND
Sri Ciatthubhuj Panwar, S/o. Late Ratanlal Panwar, Aged 62 years, Occ.Business, R/o. H.No. 3-6-71 7, Street No.1 1 , Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad.
...Respondent
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP . NO:8171 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the passing of the exparte orders in R.C.No. 3'l B of 2013 on the file of the ll Additional Rent Controller, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Revision in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AADESH VARMA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI K. SAIRAM MURTHY
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICECHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
/
CML REVISION PETITIONNo.6236 of 2O16
ORDER:
This Civil RevisionPetition underSection 227 of t]:,e Constitution of India isfiled by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 31.10.2016in l.A.No.41 of 2015 in R.C.No318 of 2013 passed by theCourtof llAdditionalRent Controller, Hyderabad.
2, Learned counsel for thepetitioner as wellas learned counsel for therespondentsubmits that the Civil Revision
Petition has becomeinfructuous.
closed.
SD/-K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// q SECTION OFFICER
To, '1. The ll AdditionalRent Controller,at Hyderabad'
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410212022
1HE S rA
+ (
c) .|.
iri") ?5 MAB 202 I
\;\1
). .r.
..i.i
ORDER
CRP.No.6236 of 2016
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
g %*
4"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable given the infructuous nature of the proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Loya
Sri Clubhuj Panwar
Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
