Dismissed

Paradise Joseph Timothy, Karimnagar Dist and Nine Others v. the Society of Trusi.Indi.Chur.in India, Karimnagar Dist

Telangana HC27 Sept 2022CRP/2788/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a bench dismissed the petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's submission that the underlying cause for adjudication no longer survived. No costs were awarded, and a pending miscellaneous petition, if any, was dismissed. The relief sought involved suspension of prior orders in an O.S. and C.M.A.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs. Any pending miscellaneous petition was also dismissed.

Paradise Joseph Timothy, Karimnagar Dist… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEN,IBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 27BB OF 2016

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia against/aggrieved by the Order dated 8-2-2016 in C.M.A.No. 10 of 2015 confirming the Orders in l.A.No. 39 of 2015 in O.S.No. 3 of 2015 01.06.2015 on the file of the Court of the lll Additional District Judge, Karimnagar on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sircilla

¶8

Between

¶9

'1. Paradise Joseph Timothy, S/o. Yella Goud, R/o. H.No.8-6-90, 8-6-91, Rahoboth Prayer House, Markandeyanagar, Vemulawada Town and Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶10

Penta Shankar,, S/o. Mallaiah, aged 35 years, R/o.H. No.2-4-76, Ambedkarnagar, Vemulawada Town, Karimnagar District.

¶11

Bingulla Komraiah,, S/o. Nayakaiah, aged 60 years, R/o. .No. 10-3-18, New Urban Colony, Vemulawada Town, Karimanagar District.

¶12

Mukku Shankar,, S/o. Kondaiah, aged 55 yers, R/o. H.No. 10-5-56, New Urban Colony, Vemulawada Town, Karimnagar District.

¶13

Gasakanti Lingaiah @ Lazer, S/o. Poshaiah, aged 60 yealts, R/o. H.No. 1-1023, New Urban Colony, Vemulawada Town, Karimnagar District.

¶14

Arelli Narsaiah,, S/o. Chinnaiah, aged 55 years, R/o. H.No. 2-4-1 19, Ambedkar Nagar, Vemulawada Town, Karimangar District.

¶15

Ragiri Madhu,, Si o. Narayana, aged 40 years, R/o. H.No. 10-1-175, New Urban Colony, Vemulawada Town, Karimnagar District.

¶16

B. Kummari Shankar @ Band Shankar,, S/o. Ashaiah, aged 50 years, R/o. H.No. 2-4-157 , Ambedkarnagar, Vemulawada Town. Karimnagar District.

¶17

Suddala Bhumaiah @ Devadanam, S/o, tt/allaiah, aged 43 years, R/o.H.No. 1-77, Burugupalli Village of Boyanapalli Ir/andal Karimnagar Distrtict.

¶18

l0.Katikala Guruvaiah,, S/o. Rajaiah, aged 45 years, R/o. H.No. 9-6-1 , BSNL Office Vemulawada Town, Karimnagar District.

¶19

...PETITI9NERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS

¶20

AND

¶21

The Society of Trsutees lndigenous Churches in lndia, H. No.^{1 -1-574,} Golconda Cross Roads, Hyclerabad. ttep. by its Authorized Dignitary R.Veerachary Rehcboth Prayer House, .H.No. 8-6-91, Rahoboth Prayer House, Itr'lark,an deya nag ar, /emulawacla tovrn and lVlandal, Karinrnagar District.

¶22

.. RESPONIIENTS/RESPONDENTS/PETITIC NERYPLAINTIFF

¶23

CRPMP. NO: 3534 OF 2016

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srrpport of the^petition, the High Court may be pleased ro suspend thei orders ir l.A.No. 39 of 2015 in O.S.No. 3 of 2015 dated 01.06.2015 on the file of the Serrior Civil Judge, Sircilla, and the consequential orders in C.M.A.No.^'10 of 2015 dated 8-2-2016 on the file of the lll Additional District Judge, Karimnagar pencling disposal of the C.R.P. in the interest of Justice.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. P NAGENDRA REDDY

¶26

Counsel for the Sole Respondenl : SRI K V BHANU PRASAD\

¶27

The Court made the following: OttDER

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶29

CML REVISION PETITION No.2788 of 2O16

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

When the matter is taken up for hcaring the learned counsei for the

¶32

petitioner submits that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous as

¶33

the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for adjudication

¶34

In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the

¶35

petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.

¶36

As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petition, If any, pending in this Civil

¶37

Revision Petition, shall stand dismissed

¶38

SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTAryI-REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// IJL) SECTION OFFICER

¶39

To,

¶40

The lll Additional District^Judge, Karimnagar.

¶41

The Senior Civil Judge, Sircilla,^{Karimnagar Districtnow Rajanna Siricilla} District.

¶42

One CC to SRl. P NAGENDRA^{REDDY,Advocate.[OPUC]}

¶43

One CC to SRl. K V BHANU PRASAD,^{Advocate.[OPUC]}

¶44

Two CD Copies

¶45

One Spare Copy

6\tr'

HIGI.I COURT

DATE:D:27 !0912022

z
F8'
1
l0i i
TI IN
,/

¶51

ORDER

¶52

CRP.N o.2788 o" 2016

¶53

DISMISS!NG THE CRP AS INFRUTCUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶54

@o'1.( A*

Paradise Joseph Timothy, Karimnagar Dist and Nine Others v. the Society of Trusi.Indi.Chur.in India, Karimnagar Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paradise Joseph Timothy, Karimnagar Dist and Nine Others v. the Society of Trusi.Indi.Chur.in India, Karimnagar Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Menthula Venkateswarlu Vs Dr. L.V. Reddy Memorial School

Taherunnisa Begum, Hyderabad and 2 Others Vs MD Aleemoddin, Medak Dist

V.Srinivas Rao Vs M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Limited

S Lakshmi Vs G Murali

Saptagiri Agenceies Vs Delight chemicals Private Ltd.

Harish Rawtani Vs Narainds Hassomal Lalwani and Another