Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka dismissed Civil Revision Petition No. 4493 of 2014 as infructuous and without orders, having become academic due to the cause no longer subsisting.
Civil Revision Petition No. 4493 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE IWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4493 OF 2014
Petition under Article 227 ol the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated 14-12-2013 in Arbitration Case NO. 364 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Arbitral Tribunal, Hyderabad.
Between
AND
CRPMP. NO: 6142 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance to the Award dl. 1411212013 passed in ARC.No. 364 of 2012 before the Arbitral Tribunal at Hyderabad including the EP. No. 17 of 2014 on the file of the court of the XVI Additional District Judge, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the CRP.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. KOPPULA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
CIVIL REVISION PETITIO N No.4493 of 2OI4
ORDER:
When the matter is laken up for hearing the lcarncd counsel for the petitioner submits that the Civil Revision petition has become infructuous as the cause in the Civil Revision petition does not survive for adj udication.
In r.iew of tLLe represclttation made by the learncd counsel for the petitioner, the Civil llcvision Petitic-rn is clismissecl as inliuctuous. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand dismissed.
SD/.G.SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ( 1i': To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The Arbitral Tribunal Hyderabad. J. One CC to SRl. KOpPULA GOPAL, Advocate. IOPUC) 4. ff: BB to sRL MAHESWARA RAd i<ui.,inEn,il,-io"*cate. [opUC] 5. One Spare Copy SB rts
HIGH COURT
DATED:2610912022
ORDER
e iA'i t- 6i
r0
\ \t<br>f,f
+t)/
CRP.No.4493 of 2014
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUTCUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Q*oss
V.Srinivas Rao
V.Anuradha
M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Limited
K. s rin iva s
Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
