The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 challenging an order in an impleadment application. The bench held that it was premature to interfere as the trial court's final orders in the main arbitration case had not yet been passed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2435 OF 2022
Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 0lll1/2O22 in ARB.OP.No.02|2022, on the file of the Judge, Family Court - Cum - IV Addl District Judge and Session Judge, Sangareddy.
Between:
Smt. Badguna Neelaveni, W/o. Sri Deva Reddy, Aged about 32 Yrs, Occ. Household, Fl/o. H.No.2-217, Siddilakunta, Nirmal, Adilabad, TS - 504 106.
...Petitioner/Proposed Respondent No.7 in Arb.OP.No.2l2022lPelitioner.
AND
Petitioners/Respbndents.
...Respondents/Respondents
lA NO: 3 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Main Case in ARB.OP.No.O2l2O22, which is pending before the Judge, Family Court - Cum - lV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Sangareddy.
For the Petitioner(s):SRl. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA
For the Respondents:
The Court made the following: ORDER
)
\ \
I I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
CML REVISION PETITION No.2435 OF 2022
ORDER: r Hon'ble Si Justice P.Noueen Rao
Heard Sri Prabhakar Sripada, learned counsel for the petitioner.
...,__;-.*- \ ,-.
,-.
I
--)-
SD/.G,SIREESHA ASSISTANTREGISTR,AR //TRUE COPY' 1- ,1 , SECTIONOFFICER
To,
xV(
HIGH COURT
PNRJ & JSRJ
DATED:0411112022
-,z-:=:<br>/;a:'rArE o\ -('i:
c.'
11 t'['l ttll
ORDER
CRP.No.2435 of 2022
DISMISSING THE CRP WITHOUT COSTS.
-1 qK
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 concerning premature listing and final orders in arbitration proceedings should be entertained.
Whether the apprehension of grave prejudice justifies intervening in the trial court's scheduling of an impleadment application and final orders on the same day.
Whether the revision petition can challenge procedural orders pending at the trial court stage.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Badguna Neelaveni
Sri. Garneni Chalapathi Rao
Sri. Pinnamaneni Raja Rao
Sri. Mallela Srinivas Yadav
Sri. Sivarathiri Sekhar
Sri. M. Shravan Kumar Yadav
P Naveen Rao
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
