Dismissed

Abdul Mujeeb, Mahabubnagar District v. Irfana Begum, Mahabubnagar Dist and Anr, Rep.by P.P.,Hyderabad

Telangana HC19 Oct 2022CRLRC/94/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging a Family Court maintenance order. The Court observed that the petitioner, Abdul Mujeeb, failed to appear or endorse the proceedings at any stage, deeming the plea inactive.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision case dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.

Abdul Mujeeb, Mahabubnagar District Vs Irfana… — Maintenance and Alimony | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

t^325e1

¶2

oF TELANGANA rN rHE^HIGH "ou*lfB$otso?tsE

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE .'--^{NINETEENTHDAY OF OCTOBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{Dr. JUSTICED'NAGARJUN}

¶6

CRI MINAL REVISIO^{N CASENO:94 0F 2011}

¶7

criminal Revision^{case379 & 401 of crl.P.cagainstthe order dated} 29-11-2010 in M.C.No.14 of^{2O1Oon the file of the court of the Judge, Family} Court -cum- Additional District Court^{at Mahabubnagar.}

¶8

Between:

¶9

AND

¶10

Abdul Mujeeb, S/o. M.A.Sattar @ Sardar, aged 40^years, Occ: Record Assi sta nt i n the District Po^I ice off ice, r, n, o::Brrni+,8ft [tlHElsib RliEiiif

¶11

lrfana Begum, W/o. Abdul Mujeeb, aged 36 years, Occ: Household Rt/o. H.No. e-31 /'1, N/arru, s.s.Gutta, Mahabubnagar, ri:.*J8BariLPli[.[l=r,r,o,u=*l

¶12

The State of A.P., Rept. through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011 (CRLRCMP. NO : 142 OF 2O111

¶15

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances state in the Memorandum of crounds of criminar Revision case, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 29-1 1-2010 rendered in M.c.No.14 of 2oio on the fire of the Judge, Famiry court cum Additionar District Court at Mahabubnagar pending disposal of the revision.

¶16

Counset for the petitioner: SRt S. GIRIMOJI RAO (Not being present)

¶17

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI MOHD YOUSUF

¶18

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: pUBLtC PROSECUTOR

¶19

The Court made the following; ORDER

¶20

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN c AL REVI SION CASE No.94 ot 2011

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the Order dated 29-ll-2OIO in M.C.No. 14 of 2OlO on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Mahaboobnagar granting maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month frorn December, 2O10 onwards.

¶25

As seen from the proceeding dated 24-Ol-201I this Court directed to deposit^{SOoh of maintenance} amount as awarded^{against the petitioner.There is no} representation on^{behalf of the petitioner'Even on} earlier occasion^{also, there is no representationfrom the} petitioner and^{the sarne is recorded and the matter is} listed under^{the caption 'for dismissal''Even today there} is no representation^{on behalf of the petitionerand it} appears^{that the petitioner is notinterestedin} prosecuting^{the case'}

¶26

¶27

¶28

In view of the above, this Criminal Revision

¶29

Case is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶30

Accordingly, this Crimina-l Revision Case is

¶31

dismissed for non-prosecution. There is no order as to

¶32

costs.

¶33

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if

¶34

any, sha1l stand closed.

¶35

SD/.A.V.S.S.C.S,M.SARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶36

i/TRUE COPY/i ,1.-,, i ' I (1 t-/ - ,.

¶37

SECTION OFFICER

¶38

To,

¶39

'1 . The Judge, Family Court --cum- Additional District Court at Mahabubnagar. (with records, if any)

¶40

One CC to Sri S. Girimoji Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

One CC to Sri Mohd. Yousuf, Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶43

Two CD Copies gbr

c-l-

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1911012022

ORDER

CRL.R.C.No.94 ol 2011

¶49

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE FOR NON PROSECUTION

Abdul Mujeeb, Mahabubnagar District v. Irfana Begum, Mahabubnagar Dist and Anr, Rep.by P.P.,Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Mujeeb, Mahabubnagar District v. Irfana Begum, Mahabubnagar Dist and Anr, Rep.by P.P.,Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gubbala Jyothi Vs The State of Telangana

Shaikh Abdul Munaf, Kotta Peta, Kurnool Vs Sabina Bano, Toli Chowki, Hyd and 3 Others, Rep.by Pp., Hyd

N.Somashekar Reddy Vs Yagga Mallesham

Manoj Soni ,Manoj Kumar soni Vs The State of Telangana and another

K.Bhardwaj, Vs M. Srinivasa Rao

M/s. Pfizer Limited Vs The State of Telangana