The High Court dismissed the pending Criminal Revision Case for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or submit any representation after being listed for dismissal on multiple occasions. The matter was disposed of without orders on costs.
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 657 OF 2011
Crl.Revision Case Under Section 397 Ryw. 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 14-03-2011 in Crl.M.P.No. 1473 of 2011 in C.C.No. 606 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the X Metropolitan Magistrate , Cyberabad at Malkajgiri
Between:
K.Bhardwaj, S/o Venkateswara Sastrr, Occ: Bus;iness, Fl/o Seven Hills Diamond Apartments, Flat No.401, Geethanagar Colony, ECIL Post, Hyderabad-062
...PETITIONER/ Accused
AND
...RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201'l(CRLRCMP. NO: 1002 OF 20111
Petition under Section 482 CPC praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC.No.606 of 2008 on the file of the X Metrgpolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri pending disposal of the main Crl.R.C.,
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. V. N. SURYAPRAKASH RAO( notpresent)
Corrnsel for the Respondent No.2 : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG)
Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOIJRABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.657 of 2O11
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is hled aggrieved by the Order dated 14-03-2011 in Crl.M.P.No.l473 of 2011 in C.C.No.606 of 2008 on the hle of the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri wherein the petition filed by the lretitioner/accused for recall of PW1, was dismissed.
2
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if
any, shall stand closed.
SD/.CH. VENKATESHWARLU DEPUTYIREGISTRAR //TRUE coPY// { Y9 SECTION OFFICER
Tol. The X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri.(with records if any)
NPJ *V
HIGH COURT
DNRJ
DATED:1911012022
1 $€ S'!-4 r(-
ciu<br>oo 2 3 ris il?l
*
P.n1
ORDER
CRLRC.No.657 of 2011
DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C FOR NON PROSECUTION
\
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed due to non-prosecution.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Bhardwaj
M. Srinivasa Rao
The State
D.Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
