turther stated rn ll e charge shcct thal on the same day ol'the death of the ileceascd e rn 25.06.2014. lltc mother ol'thc deccased(LW.2) call1c to thc pi'lic,: station and lodgcd a conrplaittt about the death of her tlaughtcr r,nrr hich a ca:ic \vas rcgistercd as Crirre No.668 of 2014 undcr Section li'4 Cr.P.C. and they seized the suicide note, apparently written by the rI ceaseci, irt the presence of the mediators. In the suicide note, the,leceased stated that nobody was responsible for her death. The b''r,ther of the dcceased preferred a court referred complaint, exprcssing suspicion about the death olhis sister and that the suicide n(lte'vas not writtcn b1, his sister, as suclt. the collected suicidc note alon r with the arlrnitted signatures ol the deceased were sent to FSl,, ri hcre the Assistant Directorof FSL gal,e opinion that the hand writing on ihe suicide note and the admittcd signatures of the deceased werc()r s and the sarr.rc. ;\s both the crinres in Crime No.668 of 2014 under licction 174 Cr.P.C. and Crime No.l399 of 2014 were arising out o1'tl^c san-re case , both the cases were clubbed together and investigated into As per police, the death of the deceased was not honricidal but i. vas a suicide and Al and A2 abetted the suicide and drove the decca;ed to comnrit suicide. As per the Investigating Oflicer, theil irr,'estigation revcalcd that Sections 120-P,302, 406,
