Dismissed

Kiran Borkar, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Telangana HC4 Nov 2022CRLRC/650/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of Criminal Revision Case No. 650 of 2017 under Section 397 Cr.P.C. along with Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 1066 and 3041 of 2017, finding the cause of action extinct and dismissed the revision as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case associated with Crl.M.P., along with miscellaneous petitions, dismissed.

Kiran Borkar, Hyderabad., Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 650 OF 2017

¶6

Criminal Revision case under Sections 3971401 of Crl.P.C against the Order dated 16-02-2017, in Crl.tt/.P.No.2796 of 2015 in C.C.No.408/2014 on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan tvtagistrate, at H yd era bad .

¶7

Betwee n:

¶8

Kiran Borkar, S/o. Vinayak, aged about 25 years, Occ: Student, R/o.6-1-68/4, Luthern Church Lane, Lakidikapul, Hyderabad.

¶9

... Petitione r/Petitioner/Accus ed No.4

¶10

AND

¶11

The state of teJangana, through -S.H.O., l,4angalhat Police Station, Hyderabad, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

... Res po n d enURes po n de nUCo m plain ant

¶13

CRL.R.C.M.P. NO: 1066 OF 2017

¶14

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the I\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision case, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the Appearance of the Petitioners in C.C.No.40812014 on the file of the XVI Additional Chief N,4etropolitan l,4agistrate at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case.

¶15

CRL.R.C.M.P. NO: 3041 OF 2017

¶16

Petition under Section 482 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the above Criminal Revision Case.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. S.V.R. SUBRAMANYAM

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶21

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.65O of 2077

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Crirninal Revision Case is fiied to set aside the order dated 16.02.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2796 of 2015 in CC.No.408/2014 on the fllc ol the XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at I{yderabad.

¶24

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel fbr the petitioner submitted thar the cause of action would not survive, as such, the matter rvould become infructuous and sought permission to withdraw the revision.

¶25

Permission is accorded and the Criminal Revision Case is

¶26

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed.

¶28

¶29

To,

¶30

Sd/. A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' ; SECTION OFFICER

¶31

The XVI Additional Chief lvletropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad (with records if any)

¶32

The Station House Officer, Mangalhat police Station, at Hyderabad.

¶33

I \

¶34

Two CCs to the public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.(OUT)

¶35

One CC to SRt. S. V. R. SUBRAMANYAM, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies

k+r'l

HIGH COURT

Dr.G.RR J

DATED:0411112022

ORDER

CRLRC.No.650 o12017

a T H t4
.i
n 1
Ffi W fnI
I*
()
rtlcllF-a,*

¶44

DISMISSING THE CRL.RC AS WITHDR.{\'N.

¶45

^'L-
I L{) ,l

Kiran Borkar, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Borkar, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Vamseedhar Reddy , Vamshi, Bangalore., Vs v.Madhu Mohana Reddy, Anantapur and Anr, Rep Pp.

Mr.Adusumilli Serveswara Rao Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and 2 Others

Lohitha Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., and Another Vs M/S. Cornileus Pharmaceuticals Pvt., and Another

Sri Shishir Kumar Kedia, Hyd., Vs Master Sudansh Kedia, Hyd and Anr, Rep Pp.

Akhil Ekambaram, Sec-Bad and Anr., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Bomma Anjaiah, Karimnagar and Anr., Vs the Stateof Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.