Dismissing the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings, the High Court of Telangana relied on the prosecution's submission that the matter is a part-heard trial in Sessions Court and the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition may be dismissed per the case status.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A,SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9157 OF 2013
Between:
Gudepu Balaiah, S/o. Gudepu Komaraiah, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Chellur Village, Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar District.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
...Respondents/Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof CriminalPetition, the High Court may bepleased toquash theproceedings in PRC.No.79of 2013 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrateat Huzurabad, Karimnagar District, arising out of Crime No.104 of2013 on the file of the Veenavanka Police Station, Karimnagar District.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(CRLPMP. NO: 8564 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ofCriminalPetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all furtherproceedingsincluding appearance of thepetitioner in PRC No.79 of 2013 on the file ofthe Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Huzurabad,Karimnagar
District arising out of Cr.No.104 of 2013 on the file of VeenavankaPolice Station, Karimnagar District.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments oflVl/s Y. Ashok Raj, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2not appearing in person or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
ilo\ot It \til.[. slil.il s t t( I .s \'f ilosrr ru. I)r)\
('RI\ll\ \1. PI' I l'l IO\ \o.9157 of 20ll
oR1)1..tt:
Ihis crirninal pctition is lllcd to tiuash tlrc procccdines in P.R.(1.No.79 of'l0li on thc {llc of'Atlditional .ludicial Magistratc of Irirst('lass, I{r"rzLrrabad. I(arin.rnagar [)istrict against thc l)etitiolr cr/acc u sc(l.
I-carncd Assistant I)r-rblic l)rosccr.rtor subrnits tlrat sirrce thcrc was no stay, thc P[{C r.vas comlxittcd to thc CourL o{-Sessions and as pcr thc casc status infblntation, thc niattcr is corning on 01 .09.2022 and it is showing as "part-hcard trial"
[.carncd counscl lbr the pctitioncr subtnits that duly rccording thc sarrc, thc pctition rray bc disrnisscd.
ln vierv ol'thc sarrc, Rccording tl-rc said subrnission, the
crirninal pctition is disrnisscd. Misccllarrcous pctitions pending, il'
any, shall stand c loscd
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,V SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DArED:1310712022
ORDER
CRLP.Nc,.9157 of 2013
*Ex
/"'
22 sEP 2fr72
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
rt
a
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gudepu Balaiah
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Gudepu Lakshmi
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
