This criminal revision petition, seeking to quash an order directing the petitioner to pay maintenance, was dismissed after counsel submitted that the matter was settled and parties are living together.
Maintenance order confirmed; irregularities in the maintenance order quashed due to settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 929 OF 2016
Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Order daled 31 .12.2015 passed in M.C. No. 228 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case Cum Additional Family Court, Hyderabad
Between:
B.Srinivas Reddy, S/o. B. Janga Reddy,aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H No. 2-38, Patiguda, Ragannaguda Post Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT
AND
Respondents 2 and 3 are minors, rep by their natural mother andguardian i.e., respondent no.1
All are R/o. H No. 17-1-473182, Krishna Nagar Adjacent to Vinay Nagar, ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS Saidabad, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
CRLRCMP. NO: 1339 OF 2016
Petition under Section 389(1)Cr PCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to suspend the execution of the Order dated 31.12.2015passed in M.C. No. 228 o! 2011 on the file of Additional Metropolitan SessionsJudgefor the
Trial of Jubilee I llls Car Bomb Blast Case cum Addl Farnily,Corrt, Hyderabad, pending disposal rrf revision case before this Hon'ble Cour: .
Counsel for the I etitioner :SRl. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK
Counsel for the I lespondent No. 1 to 3 : --
Counsel for the I lespondent No. 4 : PUBLIC PROSECU-fOlt (TG)
The Court made he following: ORDER
IloNot-lR,\rlr.r. sRr .lt.s I r(_1,. ,.s,\ illosll Rul)DY
CRlNllNAl, lLl.lVlSION(lASFl, No.929 of 20t6
otrDt..t{:
I'lris clinrinal l{cvision is lilcd aggricvcd bl thc ordcr datcd I I .12.20 l5 passccl in M.('.No.l2E o1' l0 I I on thc fllc ol'Additional Mctropolitan Scssionsjudgc lbr thc.l'rial ol' .lubilcc Ilills(lar []omb []last(lase-curn-Add itiorral []anrily Court, Ilydcrabad by dirccting thc 1-rctitioncr to lra),an anroLrnt ol'Rs.7-500/- to thc first respondcnl and Rs.6000/- cach pcl uronth to rcspondcnt Nos.2 and 3 towards their nronthly rraintcnancc liour thc datc o1'pctition.
petitioncr subnrits that thc nrattcr is scttlcd out o1-thc Court and the partics arc livirrg togctlrcr'. llcncc. thc;rctition nray bc dismisscd. 3. [)uly rccording thc said subnrission. tlris C'r'irninal I{cvision
Casc is disrnisscd. Misccllancous pctitions pcnding, i1'any, shall
stand closcd
SD/.M.VIJAYABHASKAR JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,.l$-{'(r4{"-'-' sedtr6NoFFlcER
To,
t. The AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee ' FiifirE;i'd;r6'iirriicri" cum Addition'lFamilv court' Hyderabad
A,
HIGH COUIiIT
DATED:121 t712022
ORDER
CRLRC.No 929 of 2016
,. ET4r
N
'r'I
YI:. rl
?2 ri!li 2u7
l: l/
:--,1
DISMISSINCi TI IE ]RL.R.C
?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition should be allowed given that the matter is settled between parties.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Srinivas Reddy
B. Sangeetha
Baby Mahitha Reddy
Baby B.Gnapika Reddy
The State of Telangana
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
