The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings for lack of prosecution and non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i i i I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8374 OF 2013
Between:
Chetan Tendulkar, S/o Ramesh Chandra Tendulkar, aged 42 years, occ: Business Rlo # 8-702, Zarna Holy Cross Road, lC Colony Borivali (W) Mumbai-400103
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.5
AND
1 The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP., Hyderabad 2 J.Rama Krishna, Sio.J. Kushalaia h, Prop.l,4/s Srinidhi Distributors G-'14, H.No.3-9 Sri man Rama Towers Chaitanyapuri Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No.167 of 2012 of lX Special Magistrate Court, Cyberabad at Hasthinapuram, Hyderabad, R.R.District.
CRL.P.MP. NO: 7771 OF 2013
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased t6 stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in CC No.167 of 2O12 of lX Special f,4agistrate Court, Cyberabad, at Hasthinapuram.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lVemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Cheruku Srinivas, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
IIONoURABLI' SRIJUSTICI', A.SANTI{OSII REDDY
CRIMINAL PL,TI'IION No.8374 of 2 013
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.167 of 2012 on the file of IX Special Magistrate Court,
Cyberabad, Hasthinapuram, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District.
TlLere is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it
appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter.
In view of the same, this criminal petition is dismissed for
non-proset:ut ion.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO
//TRUE COPY/I
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Grii
SECTION OFFICER
To,'1. The lX spec;ial Magistrate court, cyberabad at Hasthinapuram, Hyderabad. Z. OnL CC toSiri Ven"kateshwar Varaiasi, Advocate,[OPUC]
;: i*6 CCs totfrepublic prosecutor,High Courtfor the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
,
i I t
{ I I i t I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1011til2422
ORDER
G 51a ;€
(o 'N
q
J
,) OE AUE 202 C)
.+
t','JC
CRLP.No.8374 of 2013
DISMISSINCi THE CRL.P FOR NON PROSECUTION
i6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings is maintainable when the petitioner is not interested.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chetan Tendulkar
The State of A.P.
J. Rama Krishna
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
