Dismissed

Nadikuda Pandu v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Apr 2022CRLP/6719/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nadikuda Pandu filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR registered under Section 420 IPC. The High Court dismissed the petition as the investigation was complete with a charge sheet filed and no representation was made by the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as no representation was made by the petitioners and the investigation was complete.

Nadikuda Pandu Vs the State of Telangana — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE^{THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEUJJAL BHUYAN}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO: 6719 OF 2021}

¶6

Between:

¶7

I NAD|KUDA PANDU, S/o^{Late N.Chinnappa,}

¶8

NADIKUDA VITTAL^{YADAV, S/o Late N Chinnappa}

¶9

NADIKUDA UIVA^{KUMAR' S/o Late Chinnappa Rao}

¶10

4 NADIKUDA SHOBHA, W/o^{N.Vittal Yadav,}

¶11

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED^{Nos.8 to 1 1}

¶12

AND

¶13

The state of Telangana,^{through Public Prosecutor, High court for the state} of Telangana At^HYderabad.

¶14

DT.P.SHANKAR^{RAO, S/o Rajaiah}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under section^{482 of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be} ;i;r.;J^{to QUASHthe FIR No.337/2021 of P S.shadnagar, cyberabadunder} bection -⁴²⁰ of lpC^{as the same is untenable either on facts or underlaw.}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c^{prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the lrilemorandum^{of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be} pi"us"O to STAy all further^{proceedings pursuantto FIR No.337/2021 of} F.S.i;,.Onugrr, Cyberabad^{under Section -420 of IPC includingarrest of} Petitioners^pending disposal^{of the main Criminal Petition'}

¶19

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of criminal^{Petition and upon hearingthe argumentsof sri N PANDAIAH} Advocate for the^{Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the} Respondent No.1 and^{none appeared for the RespondentNo 2'}

¶20

The Court made the^{following: ORDER}

¶21

THE HON'BLE SRI JUS?ICE UJJAL BHtryAN

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.6719 of,2O2t

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

None appears for the petitioners on call though Mr. S.Ganesh, learned Assistant. Public Prosecutor is present for the lirst respondent-Slate o['l'elangana.

¶25

2 Pehtioners.ii'e accusetl l\os.8 to 11 in Crirne No.337 of '20'21 registered belbre Si-ra.dnagai Police Station. C-1'beriibad under SectiotL 42O of ttre Indiarr Penai Codc, 1860 (lPC).

¶26

3 This petition hrrs beer-r filecl under Sectior-t 482 o1 ttre Code ci Criminal Proceciure. 1.q73 (Cr.P.C) for qr-rashing of the iirsL information report.

¶27

4 We find tlrat on requ(rst of learned counsel for the petitiom:rs the case wa-s previonsiy ;rdjor-rrne<1 on four occasioris. But toda]' there is no representation o;r behallofthe petitioners.

¶28

5 Mr. S.Ganesh, ieamr:d Assistant Public Prosecutor, submits that as a matter of ,act-. irrvesrigation in Crirne No.337 of 2021 is complete wherealter chargc sheet has been filed betirre thc learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnagar on 29.07.)021 being \ C.C.No.963 of 2021..

¶29

6 In view of the aforesaid development, question of quashing the first information report at this stage may not arise. However, it is open to the pctitioners to question the legality and^validity of^the charge sheet in appropriate^proceeding, if so advised.

¶30

¶31

7 Subject to the above, this criminal^petilion is^{dismissed. As a} sequel miscellaneous petitions, if any,^pending in this criminal petition, shali also stand dismissed.

¶32

Sd/. T.KRISHNA KUMAR ,/ ISTRAR^! ASSISTANT^REG

et'o

,TRUE^COPY//

SEGTION^OFFICER

to ',. an" Additional Judicial First class Magistrate' Shadnagar'^Mahabubnagar District.

¶37

zini'5i,tionn",:"?,[,8?'d,::3i"Tt-ru,i3ix",tt3t',"rt$:r:i?:ffi^5t',r"t -a. f*o CCs to the Pub

¶38

8.1-t"^{to Sri N Pandaiah' Advocate toPUCl}

¶39

¶40

Two^C.D.CoPies

¶41

6 One SPare^CoPY MRC

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1310412022

ORDER

CRLP.No.6719^{ol 2021}

¶48

:i T ;€
(
t
of,
2 tl JLlt'l 2022
*
D ES PAT c

¶49

DISMISSING^{THE CRIMINALPETITION}

¶50

6*i-)
-gg_-
-qpv"

Nadikuda Pandu v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nadikuda Pandu v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Padmabham and 3 others Vs Sri. Jai Kumar , Deepak Kumar

Yerra Nagesh Vs Y.Anasuya

Church of South India Trust Association Vs Dr.P.Jonathan Dharmaraj

Sri K.Rambabu, Hyd and 12 Others Vs M/S S R R Infra Projects Limited, Hyd

Mohd. Bahramuddin Vs Sri a. Balaji

K.Amarender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another