The High Court dismissed an application for appointing a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, as the applicant withdrew the application during the hearing.
Arbitration application dismissed on withdrawal; pending petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEUJJAL BHUYAN
ARBITRATION APPLICATIONNO: 111 OF 2017
Between:
(No.8 to 11 he'ein arerepresentedby their Anreement of Salecum GPA ilolder,No. '1 herein inilft'nnilr"a1aL' sr9 r-ilfE sp'onslVA RAo'aged about 65 vears,6"i'i;iii;"' - Business' R/o: Flat No 205' [/]etro ,,, ${:il.llit[t]lii,!T,*orffi'#'^t'tl1'f3;w]RA Business'RAo s/o R/o: 301 . sRr 'Hymac RAVINDRA, "e, " 0 'o'oJi+d'y""^t''ci"t'oatton: illi viht ;i co ^r_*t U+tr6l ?'ffi V'f+l "Ii,ff |ieBi' i?T,m e rr y M / s rVr RC 13. tu/s.' MRCINFRASTRUCI UIF f^lY:,1:'"'^"'^^:"^;:1,jn.,,-.n'nrated un der Constructionsri Conti)Ifis-biiuut"'f-irit"O), a comDanvincorporated( ;#;;;i;; ili;'h;;; nnNlgReu no stc> I. i io, r r_nrE"ii"dio"n5 s Hvoeranad:soo sd',"h ;"'s' ii'' rltA 0B'.r- otri c"-at' nno-, fgPres'rsgd t''j ^[3'015about -6 5 I JBllS",3'!yea rs.occupation .tii ?: Business,R/o : Ftat r'rlios]r,r"i.iesidencv,RajbhavanRoad'ip$iistoiSit
AND
N,l/S S R RINFRA PROJECTSLIMITED' HYD'^A companv incorporated under comoaniesAct 1956 naurng'iistffrcJZil-i1'zul'sima comptexNear Sushma h::ln'xailtnlfffiil,x'$"Js[t$;'6rqq'F:-"'.t5i'i'ri'[$ii1:!]*" about 52 vears,occrpat'"i}jJliiJttHl' lr'rt 4'13'262 / 263'HUDAsainasar' i!"nltiriuiiprtrm,Hrrderabad - 500070 ...RESP.NDENT
...RESP.NDENT
ApplicationtrnderSection 11 (5 & 6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1956,and Scnemeof Appointmentof Arbitrators 2017 praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith' the High Court may be pleased toappoint a sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the Applicantsand the Respondents arising out of the DevelopmentAgreement dated 09-08-2012'
Thepetition coming on for hearing' upon perusingthe Applicationand affidavitfired in supportthereof and upon hearingthe argumentsof sri rarunesh' for SriSrinivas; Velagapudi' Advocatefor the Applicant and ofSri G.MadhusudhanReddy,Advocate for the Respondent
The Courtmade |re following: ORDER
1
V
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTIC E UJJALBHUYAN ARBTTRATIO N APPLICATION No.11LOF 2017
ORDER:
Heard Mr. Tarunesh, learned counselappearing for the applicant.
Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII &
To
SECTION OFFICER
1 Sri Sama Ranga Reddy, S/o. late S.Srisailam Reddy, M/s. S.R.R.lnfra Projects Limited, A Company incorporated under C6mpanies Act, .1956 having it's office at Vanasrhitipuia;,, HyG;;;;_;dii6zo, nlo. H.No.4_13_262 / 203, HUDA Sainasar, vanrsir.lil,pria.i, ivo#o1"o"l sooozs. z One CC to t,4/s.Srinivas vetagapudi, noub"jGlsplttt 43 Two CD Copiesone CC to M/s.G rvadhr.rori",i ne'aoi';&;".'rl"; lb"puct
5 One Spare Copy
zy
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 310412022
sl' :r!-
1t<br>q
y
r-1
(.) 2 3 JUt,l 2[2 ;)
+l
?-".solrc
ORDER
ARBITRATICTN APPLICATION No.111 of 2017
DISMISSINGi THE ARBITRATION APPLICATION, AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS.
K", (0
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the application for appointment of sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI K. RAMBABU
S.R.R. INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED
UJJAL BHUYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
