Dismissed

KolaganiSubhashChander v. The State of Telengana and another

Telangana HC6 Sept 2022CRLP/666/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petition as infructuous because the underlying criminal case had been compromised before the Lok Adalat, fulfilling the purpose of the petition.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were closed.

KolaganiSubhashChander Vs The State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 666 OF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

KolaganiSubhashChander, S/o Athmaram,aged 55 years Occupation. Practising Advocate Jagtial Bar Rl/o H.No. 5-27 Govindupalli Jagtial Mandal and district.

¶8

... PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telengana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor at High Court of Telengana and The SHO P. S.JagtialRural,Jagityal

¶11

PulluriChandriah, S/o Shankariah age 55 Yrs, Occ.Business Rl/o Tharakramnagar,V/o Jagityalmandal and district

¶12

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the^proceedings in C. C. No.444 of 2019 lNCrime No.38of 2019 (P.S.Jagtial Rural) lAdditional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial .

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings including arrest of The Petitioners/Accused the in C. C. No.444of 2019 lNCrime No.38 of 2019 [P. S.Jagtial Rurall I ADDL. JUDL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT JAGTIAL .

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S RAJ KUMAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 .

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

¶19

¶20

THE HONOURA]}LE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGA.IT,.IUN

¶21

CRIMINAI PETITION No.666 of 2O2O

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Crimina Petition is filed seeking quash.rnent of proceedings in C C.No.444 of 2Ol9 on the fil,: of the learned I Additior a-1 Judicial Magistrate of First Olass at Jagtial, registere< for the offences under Secti,rn,; 420, 323, 5O4 and 516 of Indian Penal Code, ?girLr-'iSt the petitioner/accust d.

¶24

Learnt d Assistant Public Frosecutor submitted a let1 er dated 02-09-2022 address:l by the Sub-lnspector o'Poiice, Jagtial Rural P.S., w-he,rr:in it is stated that thr: case in C.C.No.444 of 2Ol9 h.rs been compromised blfore Lok-adalath dated 3 1 -05 -'.), )'.,a2.

¶25

The r ame is recorded.

¶26

In vi,:w of the above submission, sirL<:e the very

¶27

purpose of fili rg this Criminal Petition is a1re;rd1' been fulhlled, no pr rpose would survive to proce<:<l with this Criminal Petiti rn and the same has become irr:ructuous.

In view of the above, this Criminal petition is

¶32

liable to be dismissed.

¶33

Accordingly, this Criminal petition is

¶34

dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if

¶36

any, shall stand closed.

¶37

sD/ MAJI ASSISTAN IS R

//TRUE COPYII

SEC N OFFICER

To,

The I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial.

¶42

The Station House Officer , JagtialRural Police Station ,Jagityal.

¶43

Two CCs to Assistant Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.(OUT )

¶44

The State of Telengana and another, Rep by its Public Prosecutor at High

¶45

One CC to SRl. S RAJ KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]

¶46

Two CD Copies

¶47

One Spare Copy

CDL

u. $\'

HIGH COURT

DATED:061091:2022

ORDER

CRL.P.No.666 )f 2020

91.A reo
g?
I
$tl i-i
1t Nt<br>.rl-
-I
ESll {F
<:- -::-:i.i-

¶55

DISMISSING :I'II II CRIN{INAL PETITTON

¶56

AS INFRUCI-LTo JS.

¶57

bvr-.
$
<<br>

KolaganiSubhashChander v. The State of Telengana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

KolaganiSubhashChander v. The State of Telengana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pochana Ditya Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Smt. Chivakula Santa Vs State of Telangana and Another

Pandi Prakasa Rao Vs The State of Telangana and Another

B.Narsimhulu Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. Azeemuddin Vs The State of Telangana

Kammari Veeresham Vs The State of Telangana