Dismissed

Mohd. Azeemuddin v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Sept 2022CRLP/2666/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash proceedings in respect of FIR No. 459 of 2019. Investigation was completed and charge sheet filed before the Magistrate. Court held petitioners infructuous due to completion of investigation and dismissal of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Mohd. Azeemuddin Vs The State of Telangana — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER N/VO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2666 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

MOHD. AZEEMUDDIN, S/o MOHD. MOHIUDDIN, Aged about 49 Years, Occ. Business R/o H.No. 12-141613, Ushodaya Colony, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad.

¶9

SHAHANA BEGUM, Wo MOHD AZEEMUDDIN, Aged about 45 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No. 12-1-41613, Ushodaya Colony, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSEDS

¶11

ANO

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

¶13

2 Mohammed Nader Khan, S/o Late Mohd. Etemad Khan, Aged about 46 Years, Occ Business, R/o H.No.^'18-1-459, Phoolbagh, Hyderabad, T.S

¶14

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 459 of 2019 of P S. Chand rayangutta, Hyderabad, dated 27 - 1 1 -20 1 L

¶16

l.A. NO: 2OF 2020

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumFtances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further the proceedings in FIR No. 459 of 2019 of P.S. Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad, daled 27-11-2019,^pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MOHD ABDUL MUQTADIR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Addirtional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri SYED MUSTAFA HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOIIRABLE DR. JUSTICE D.N,AGARJUN

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2666 of 21020

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

T1-ris Cri'ninal Petition is filed seeking quashment of proceedings in Cr.No.459 of 2OL9 of P.S. Chandrayalr gutta, registered for the offences under Sections 42O, 467 , 468, 474,506 read with Section 34 of Indian Pena-l Code, against the petitioners/accused.

¶24

Lr arned Assistant Public Prosecutor

¶25

submitted a letter dated 01-09-2022 ad<lre ssed by the Sub-lnspect or of Police, Chandrayanagutta J). S., wherein it is stated that investigation is completed and charge sheet has ;een filed before learned Chiefl Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and the same has been numbered as C.C.No.i 643 of 2021..

¶26

03.^"he same is recorded.

¶27

r-r view of the above submission, since the very purpose o' filing this Criminal Petition is ,,rlready been

¶28

)

¶29

defeated, no purpose would survive to proceed with this

¶30

Criminal Petition and the same has become infructuous.

¶31

In view of the above, this Criminal Petition is

¶32

liable to be dismissed.

¶33

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is

¶34

dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if

¶36

any, shall stand closed.

¶37

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT-REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// seil&i^oFFrcER

¶38

To,

¶39

The Chief^{Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad}

¶40

SHO, Chandrayangutta^{Police Station'Hyderabad}

¶41

Two CCs^{to the Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad}

¶42

One CC to^{SRl. MOHD ABDUL MUQTADIR Advocate IOPUCI}

¶43

One CC^{to SRl. SYEDMUSTAFA HUSSAIN Advocate [OPUC]}

¶44

Two CD^CoPies

¶45

One Spare^CoPY

GJP

HIGH COURT

DNR,J

DATED:0610912( 22

ORDER

CRLP.No.266( of 2020

,,,(l;$E STzli
i",.
,:
I [ 3 t':!! 2$22
-.. r ii-
-.4

¶53

DISMISSING'THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCT^I.,I9g5

¶54

M6A
--1-1 -L-/
dtolnffi

Mohd. Azeemuddin v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Azeemuddin v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pochana Ditya Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Smt. Chivakula Santa Vs State of Telangana and Another

Pandi Prakasa Rao Vs The State of Telangana and Another

KolaganiSubhashChander Vs The State of Telengana and another

B.Narsimhulu Vs The State of Telangana

Kammari Veeresham Vs The State of Telangana