Admittedly, registered sale deed has not been executed in favour of the petitioners. The attempt made by the petitioners to get injunction against the de-facto complainant was also not granted by the Court and was also failed. Therefore, the petitioners are admittedly not the owrlers. The dispute is whether the Government is the owner or the de-facto complainant. The possession of 150 square yards was given by the de-facto complainant in favour of the petitioners. However, the actions of the petitioners would go to show that they have taken the municipal number, electricity permission, municipal door number etc., in the name of the petitioners as if they are the owners. They have been paying the municipal tax in their name. Similarly, petitioner No.1 has executed a gift settlement deed of the land in favour ol his wife/A2 and A2, in turn, has executed GPA in favour of petitioner No.1. Therefore, the actions of the A1 and A.2 would clearly go to show that they are behaving as if they are the owners of tJ:re property.
