A criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC filed in absentia to quash proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because the police completed investigation and filed a charge sheet.
The criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous. Liberty granted to challenge the charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325s 1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5010 OF 2020
Between:
Prince Pathak, S/o Ram Kewal Pathak Aged about 33 years, Ocr. Business, R/o B- 145, Street t'Io.2, Majlis Park, Adarsh Nagar, Shanjapur, N.S. Mandi, North West Delhi, Delhi - 1 10 033.
...PETITIONER/A.1
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to FIR No.l 14 of 2020 on the file of Karkhana Police Station, llyderabad City.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the ckcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest so far as the petitioner/A-1 is concerned in FIR No.114 of 2020 on the file of Karkhana Polic,e Station, Hyderabad City.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.D SUDHARSHAN, Advocate for the Petitioner not beingpresent and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
,/
//
Ttl.It FIO.I'BLE Dr. JUSTICE D.NAGAILT[;N CR }III|AL PETITION NO.SO10 OF :ZI) 2(,I
ORDTIII:
This C'iminal Petition is frled under Sec[i(:,n 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitiorL,: "-a,:cused No. 1 to quzr sh the proceedings initiated agzd r s t him in Crime No. I t4 of 2O2O of Karkhana Poli<r: Station, Hyderabad )istrict, registered for the offe'r r:r:s under Sections 44! , L'.2O-8, 42O and 4O6 read with :]4 of the Indian Penal Code.
\
2
<br>
Pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.
.,'i3$8TiNf "#e'EiRRX /TTRUECOPY// Cth
SECTIONOFFICER
t
To,
5.Two CD CoPies
6.one spare copy
?t{q,
HIGH COURT'
DATED:281091i 022
ORDER
CRLP.No.501ll of 2020
STA r[.
1
I N
li
? E $tt ?uli
i'
' --. - '- t--
DISMISSING"I HE CRLP AS INFRUCTUC I,IIi. P^tfr '4-"-'"
rl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition to quash proceedings should be dismissed when the investigation is completed and a charge sheet has been filed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prince Pathak
State of Telangana
Divesh Singh Gandhi
D. Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
