Ono order dismissed the Criminal Petition (CRlP) and related petition for non-prosecution as infructuous due to no representation by the petitioners and continuous requests for adjournment in a 2013 case.
Petition dismissed as infructuous/non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous matters closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:4089 OF 2013
Between:
AND
..Respondent
...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin thecircumstances staled in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, theHigh Courtmaybe pleased toquash the FIR in Crime No.173 of 2013 onthe file of thePS., Pet Basheerabad, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District.
CRLPMP. NO: 3719 OF 2013
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, theHighCourt maybe pleased to stay of all furtherproceedings including arrest of thepetitioners /accusedin connection with Crime No.173 of 2013 onthe file of the PS.,Pet Basheerabad, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District,pending disposal of the quash petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petitionand upon hearing the arguments of Sri PASHAM KRlsHNAREDDY,AdvocateforthePetitionersandoftheAdditionalPUblic Prosecutor on behalfof the RespondentNo 1 and of the RespondentNo 2 not appeared eitherin person or by Advocate'
The Court madethefollowing:ORDER
HONOURABLEDT. JUSTICE CHILLAKURSUMALATHA ONN F 1
ORDER:
No representationon petitionersside' Ort 78'OL '2022' the followingorder was Passed: ukarned counsel for the petitionersseeks time to submithis contentlons' Oo 16.11.2021,23'll'2Cl21 and O1'122O2lalso tlme wassought.However,the matter cannotbe adjournedcontinuouslywithout disposalas the Criminal Petition isof the Year2013' Hence,lednedcounsel forthe petitronersls directedtosubmit hiscontentions positivetYon 04.O2.2022. l-ist the matterunder the caption "For Dismissal" InsPite ofthe said order, thereis no rePresentation' Petitionis dismissedfor Hence, thisCriminal petitions, ifany, non-prosecution.Pending miscellaneous shall stand closed.
\
Sd/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTMR //TRUE COPY// . // '/ SECTION OFFICER
To 1. The XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, at Medchal.
-'-
HIGHCOURT
D,.ED$NO2J2O22
gT AT E:
t
I
A
l:) I
-)o t5 rtB 2$11
_).-
a
ORDER
CRLP.No.4089of 2013
DISMISSING THE CRL.P.AS INFRUCTUOUS.
v>
v<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Cr.P.C. section 482 quash petition can be decided in absence of representation.
Katta Balwanth Reddy & Ors.
The State of AP.
JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
