Revenue Divisional Officer, Wanaparthy, in favour of the petitioners herein. The said letter also goes to show that basing on the letter addressed by the Station House Of{icer, Wanaparthy Town Police Station, the said information was furnished by the Tahsildar, Wanaparthy Mandal. The present complaint, basing on which the case is registered, is dated 12.06.2013, Thus it is clear that much earlier to the complaint, information is sought lor b,r'thepolice. lt is also clear that the dispute went to thc notice of thepolice much earlier to the date of complaint b-t respondent No.2andhis mother. Further more, based on the complair.rtgivenb1" respondent No.2 before the Lok ayuktha, AndhraPradesh, Hyderabad, the Tahsildar, Wanaparthy Mandal,has addressed a letter to the RevenueDivisionaiOfhcer, Wanaparthy, on 19.O6.2O13. In the saidletter also, itis indicated that as per the ROR,Metpa11y, the petitioners herein are pattadars of the disputedproperty. Further more, it is also brought on record thatthe vendorof respondent No.2 filed a case and in that orderswere passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer,Wanaparthy,infavour of petitioner No.1 herein and one Lambadi TulchaRam and aggrieved by that, an appealr.r'as prefcrred b1' the vendorof respondent No.2 before the JointCollector, Mahabubrragar. lt is also brought on record that the saidappealstood dismissed and aggrievedb-'.- thesaid orderof dismissal,the said vendor, by name N. Indiramma,filed C.R.P.No.6239 of
