Dismissed

Nunavath Veeranna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Sept 2022CRLP/3685/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cr.P. filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition, holding it infructuous as the charge sheet had already been laid, with liberty to move a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous upon laying of charge sheet; liberty granted to file fresh petition.

Nunavath Veeranna Vs The State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^320e 1

¶2

I I

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^{TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD}

¶4

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3685 OF 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

Nunavath Veeranna, S/o Harja, Aged 57 years, Occu. Agriculture, Flio Beesrajupaaly Thanda Village, Thirumalayapalem Mandal of Khammam District

¶10

...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.2

¶11

AND

¶12

'l . The State of Telangana, Through P.S., Thirumalayapalem, Khammam District Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶13

.R€spondent

¶14

Ravuri Shashi, Wo Malsuraiah, Age 47 years, Occu. Private Job, Rl/o Pindiprolu, Thirumalayapalem Mandal, Khammam District. State of Telangana.

¶15

... Defacto ComplainanURespondent

¶16

The Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Khammam. State of Telangana.

¶17

...RESPONDENT

¶18

Petition under Section 437143814391482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the Crime No. 50 of 2022 on the file of Tirumalayapalem Police Station, Khammam District against the petitioner / Accused No.2 herein and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1OF 2022

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No. 50 of 2022 on the file of Tirumalayapalem Police Station, Khammam District against the^petitioner / Accused No.2 herein pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.

¶21

l.A. NO: 2OF 2022

¶22

Petition under llection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memoranrlum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 1 and 3 to permit the petitioner herein to attend the Shree Rama Navami Festival for offering cloths (PATTU VASTRALU) to the deities in the Shree Ramalayam Temple, Beesaraiupally Thanda, Thirumalayapalem Marrdal, Khammam District on 10.O4.2022,^pelding disposal of the Criminal Petition.

¶23

This Petition coning on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Pr-.tition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B.THIMOTHI Advocate for the Pelitioner and of the Public Prosecutor or behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶24

The Court made the tbllowing: ORDER

¶25

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3685 OF 2022

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime.No.So of 2022 of Tirumalayapalem Police Station, Khammam District.

¶28

No representation on petitioner's side on call.

¶29

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶30

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survrves.

¶31

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand

¶32

Sd/. K.ONESIM closed. DEPUTYSEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER '7t)

¶33

¶34

The Principal Judicial^{First Class Magistrate atKhammamDistrict'} Z. me Statioir House^{Officer, Thirumalayapalem Police Station, Khammam} District.

¶35

S. iwo CCs to the Public^{Prosecutor,HighCourt for the Stateof Telangana} tourl

¶36

One CC to Sri B.Thimothi,^Advocate [OPUCI

¶37

Two C.D. CoPies.

k M RC

HIGH COURT

DATED:.2210912022

ORDER

CRLP.No.3685 of 20112

¶43

<br>gLA,<br>'t
?
1<br>i.: r-Y a
!l L, s
lt
t!, .c,_) oL,,IL
!r:I r'- ,su! il
a
v
4,1 ,,/,
ra-*-;:; i,/

¶44

DISMISSING THE CRITi.INAL PETITION

¶45

3',
@,

Nunavath Veeranna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nunavath Veeranna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madasu Veeranna Vs The State of Telangana and another

M/s Srinivasa Building and Developers and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

M/s Mid Field Industries Limited Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. v. Vijayasaradhi Vs The State of Telangana

Kalakuntla Jaipal Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Palle Suguna Vs The State of Telangana