Dismissed

Palle Suguna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Sept 2022CRLP/3232/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. The Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet was laid, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to file a fresh one if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition if the cause survives.

Palle Suguna Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

[^320s ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TWENW SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3232 OF 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

'I . Palle Suguna, Wo. Mallareddy, aged 58 years, Occ. House Hold, caste. Hindu, R/o. Nusthulapur (v) of Thimmapur Mandal, Karimnagar District, T.S.

¶10

Palle Mallareddy, S/o. Narsirnha Reddy, aged 60 years, Occ. agriculture, caste. Hindu, Fl/o. Nusthulapur (v) of ThimmapurMandal, Karimnagar District, T.S.

¶11

Rajitha, D/o. Mallareddy, aged 38 years, Occ. House Hold, caste.Hindu, RJo. Nusthulapur (v) of Thimmapur Mandal, Karimnagar District, T.S.

¶12

...Petitioners/Accused No.A2 to A4

¶13

AND

¶14

1 . The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad, Through SHO, P.S. LMD Colony, Karimnagar Drstrict, T.S.

¶15

Palle Sandhya Rani, Wo. Srinivasreddy, aged 31 years, Occ. House Hold, caste. Hindu, Rl/o. Nusthulapur (v) of ThimmapurMandal, Karimnagar District, T.S.

¶16

,Respondents/Complainant

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of CI.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR 352 of 2O19 dated. 1B-12-2019 on the file of Police Station, LMD Colony, Karimnagar to meet the ends of justice as the same is nothing but abuse the process of law.

¶18

l.A. NO: 1OF 2022

¶19

Petitiorr unde. Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lttlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to litay <;f all further proceedings in FIR No.FlR 352 of 2019 dated. 18-12-:1019 on the file of Police Station, LMD Colony', Karimnagar including the arrest of tt'e^petitroner pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.

¶20

This Pr-'tition :oming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimir-ral Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. Dinesh Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Responr:lent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶21

The Court macie the iollowing: OROER

¶22

I I

¶23

THE HON'BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶24

CRIMINAL PETITION No.3232 OF 2022

¶25

ORDER:-

¶26

I . The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in Crime No.352 of 2Ol9 of LMD Colony Police Station, Karimnagar District.

¶27

No representation on petitioners' side on call.

¶28

Learned Assistalt Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶29

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives.

¶30

\ i

¶31

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed

¶32

ANABHA^{REDDY ,/} SD/. P.PADM ASSIST^{ANT RE} STRAR

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

The Special^{Judicial Magistrateof First Class(Excise) at Karimnagar'}

¶38

1 2 TheStationHouseofficer,LMDCo}onyPoliceStation,Karimnagar. 3 Two CCs^{to the Public Prosecutor'High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶39

4 One CC^{to Sri G. Dinesh Patil' Advocate {OPUCI} 5 Two CD^CoPies

¶40

GJ \--

¶41

HIGH COIJR

¶42

DATED:il2l0gl2022

¶43

i iiE S74 lt:
?.
),
I ) 3 0 0Ec 202
tili .t
<br>

¶44

ORDER

¶45

CRLP.No.3232t. of 2022

¶46

DISMISSING THE CR L.P

¶47

-D
1c<br>

Palle Suguna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palle Suguna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madasu Veeranna Vs The State of Telangana and another

M/s Srinivasa Building and Developers and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

M/s Mid Field Industries Limited Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. v. Vijayasaradhi Vs The State of Telangana

Kalakuntla Jaipal Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Nunavath Veeranna Vs The State of Telangana