The High Court of Telangana dismissed a criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings under CrPC Section 482 because a charge sheet was already laid, rendering the petition infructuous.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous due to laying of charge sheet; liberty granted to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OFSEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKURSUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3382 OF 2021
Between:
Sri. Ponna Venkatramana, S/o. Sudarshan,Aged 39 Years, Occ.Business, Rl/o. H.No. 18-5-542, Aliyabad, Hyderabad- 500 0053.
...PETITIONERyACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ofCriminal Petition,the HighCourt maybe pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners AccusedNo.'l in Crime No.44 of 2021 of PS Shahalibanda,Hyderabad on the file of learnedXVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,Hyderabad at Nampallyfor the offences under Sections 323, 509, 506Ryw 34 ofIPC andSection 3(1)(0(s) of SC ST POA Act, 2015 .
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that inthe circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,theHigh Courtmaybe pleased pleased to stay of all proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.1in Crime No. 44 of 2021 of PS Shahalibanda, Hyderabadon the file of learnedXVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabadat Nampally for the offences under Sections 323, 509, 506 R/w34 ofIPC andSection 3(tX|(s) of SC ST POA Act, 2015 .
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G.BHASKER REDDY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 for the Respondent no. 2 None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3382 OF 2O2l
ORDER:-
\
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY!EGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// cJb SECTION OFFICER
To,
!I
u'$u*
I L
I 1
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310912022
ORDER
TA
(
s.'(
-g
-,
a)
1 1 tiir\l 2il22
c i{..;'- .r7
CRLP.No.3382 of 2021
DISMISSING'I'I I F] CRI,P
AS INFRU(]1'TJOTIS
Q,t'P
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ponna Venkatramana
The State of Telangana
Dr. Justice Chilla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
