There was no hearing. The Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the case was referred as false making the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
The Criminal Petition seeking quash of proceedings was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[320e ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 299 OF 2021
Between:
,..PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of CI.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toquash theproceedings in FIR No. 0412021 on the file of P.S.Vemulawada (T), Rajanna Sircilla District, in the interests ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furtherproceedings including arrest ofpetitioners herein in connection with FIR No 04i2021 on the file of PS Vemulawada(T) Rajanna Sircilla District
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentsof
/
Sri K RAGHUVEER REDDY ,Advocate for the Petitir:ner I r r I of the Assistant Public Prosecutor, ligh Court for the State of Telangu,r a on behalf of the Respondent No.1 ar I of Sri. V.Nitesh, Advocate forthe Rer;lxrrdent No.2.
The Corrrt made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.299 OF 2O2L
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are initiated against the petitioners through FIR No.4 of 2O2I of Vemulawada (T) Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District.
dismissed as infructuous.
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR r,l L-r'-'---
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BRR {14
HIGH COURI DATED:06109t2022
ORDER
CRLP.No.299 of 2021
/7',r',:-s r
,.
1-)
i'.,, a.
11! [Er tr[l
DISMISSING' HE CRIMINAL PETITION ltlii INFRIJCTUOU S
t4
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition to quash FIR proceedings should be allowed given the Policesm recommendation that the case is false.
Whether the dismiifsal of the petition solely on the basis of the informant's statement is permissible.
What disposal order to make when the informant has recommended the case as false.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vemula Srinivas and Others
State of Telangana
Padigela Sattawa
CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
