Dismissed

Naramaneni Venu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Sept 2022CRLP/6864/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This brief order addresses a criminal petition filed to quash proceedings. The petitioner side was unrepresented, while the Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation file was closed due to lack of evidence, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition is dismissed as the proceedings are closed due to lack of evidence.

Naramaneni Venu Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^32oe l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6864 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Naramaneni Venu, S / o Narasimharao Age. 37 years Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-20, Vemavaram, Krishna District.

¶9

Y adla Bhavitha, D/o Madhavarao Age. 23 years Occ. Pvt Employee, Fl/o H.No.B-64, Durga Road, Pedakakani, Guntur District.

¶10

Naramaneni Venkatesh, S/o Brahamam Age. 25 years Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-9/a, Vemavaram, Vemavaram, Krishna District.

¶11

Chava Venu, S/o Koteswararao Age. 39 years Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.32/10, Main Road, Dendukuru, Khammam District.

¶12

Bommi Srikanth, S/o Purna Chandra Rao Age. 36 years Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.10-24, Turpu Bazar, Penuganchipoly, Krishna District.

¶13

Chava Sri Rama, S/o Chava Suresh Age. 28 years Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.3-2l4, Main Road, Madhira, Dendukuru, Khammam District.

¶14

Chinna Chowdary, alias Mutthavarapu Tirupathirao, S/o Ramarao, Age. 30 years, Occ. Business, F/o H.No"3-39, Vemavaram, Krishna District.

¶15

Gurram Manisha, D/o G.Venkatanarayana Age. 22 years Occ. Pvt Employee, Rl/o H.No.'16-9-50/1 , Raod No.9, Sirnagar Colony, Khammam District.

¶16

Naramaneni Varalakshmi @ Varamma, W/o Narasimharao Age. 43 years Occ. House hold, Ri./o H.No.3-20, Vemavaram, Krishna District.

¶17

...PETITIONERS

¶18

AND

¶19

The State of Telangana, through Public Prosecutor at High Court at Hyderabad, For PS Khanapuram Haveli, Khammam District.

¶20

Mattigunta Prasanna Hima Bindu, W/o Ratna Kumar,39 years, occ. House wife, Rl/o Road No. 9, Kaviraj Nagar, Khammam.

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in F|R.No.1BO of 2021 dated 0810512021 at

¶23

Khanapuram Havel Police Station, Khammam District as a(,ainst the^petitioners herein in the inleres of^justice.

¶24

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021

¶25

Petition unde r Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C^praying that tt the circumstances stated in the Memor:ndum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the Higlh Court may be pleased to stay all 'urther proceedings in FIR lBO of 2021 daterl 08/05/202'1 at Khanapuram Haveli Police Station, Khammam District.

¶26

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the h/emorandum of Grounds of Crimine I Petition and upon hearing the argumerts 'rf Sri P. Rama Sharana Sharma, A lvocate for the Petitioner and the Assist;rnt Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of tte Respondent No.1 and none appeare(l lor the Respondent No.2.

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

THE HON'BLE DR. JI,STICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶29

CRIMINAL PETITION No.6864 OF 2O2l

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Seeking to quash the proceedings that are initiated against the petitioners through FIR No.18O of 2027 of Khanapuram Haveli Police Station, Khammam District, the present Criminal Petition is filed

¶32

No representation on petitioners' side on call. However, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits, on written instructions, that the proceedings are closed due to lack of evidence and hence, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶33

Recording the said submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissed.

¶34

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, sha1l stand closed.

¶35

¶36

,r,-r.a*rNrvAs DEPUTY REgISTRAR e r,=

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The ll Judicial First Class Magistrate^{at KhammamDistrict.}

¶41

The Station House Officer, Khanapuram^{Haveli Police Station, Khammam} District.

¶42

One CC to Sri P. Rama Sharana^{Sharma, Advocate} IOPUCI

¶43

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High^{Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUTI

¶44

Two CD Copies obr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0510912022

ORDER

CRL.P.N0.6864 of 2t21

¶50

<flil<br>t;:,
'i' ill
t','' I
,l
$ lrt{ 2rE i'ti
.A //'
'''. J. , ,l/
.f\ ' ,'
''.,,2
.:: x --. - !l';.|-l' -^^.-c''-'lz/

¶51

DISMISSING THE C IIMINAL PETITION

¶52

@
a,

Naramaneni Venu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naramaneni Venu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.v.K.Reddy alias P. Venkata Konda Reddy Vs State of Telangana

E. Venkata Krishna Reddy and 3 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Battula Sai Rahul Vs The State of Telangana

Farooq Saadi Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Mekala Srisailam and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Shaik Allah Bakshi Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others