Dismissed

Motam Raghu v. State of Telangana of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Sept 2022CRLP/2110/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court decided a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings. The Court found the petition infuctuous following the laying of the charge sheet and dismissed it with liberty to move a fresh petition if the cause continues.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous, with liberty granted to the petitioner to move a fresh petition if the cause survives.

Motam Raghu Vs State of Telangana of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^320.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMEER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2110 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Motam Raghu, S/o Yellaiah, aged 31 years, Occ. Govt. Employee, R/o 2-83lA, Veenavanka (V and M)), Karimnagar District.

¶9

...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.2

¶10

AND

¶11

State of Telangana of Telangana, represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court forthe State ofTelangana, at Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENT No.1

¶13

Vorem Rajyalakshmi, Wio Surya Rao, aged 49 years, Caste. SC Mala, Occ. Housewife Rl/o Durga Colony, Jammikunta (T and M), Karimnagar District.

¶14

... DEFACTO COMPLAINANT /RESPONDENT No.2

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No.205 of 2021 daled 01 .12.2021 on the file of P.S. Veenavanka, Karimnagar District registered u/sec 344,354, 323,307,506 r/w 34 IPC and Sec. 3 (1)(r)(s) 3 (2) (Va) of SCs and STs^(POA) Amendment Act, 20'15ⁱⁿ so far as Petitioner/Accused No.2 is concerned.

¶16

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^{may be} pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 20512021 dated O1 .'12.0021 on the file of P.S. Veenavanka, Karimnagar District registered u/sec 344, 354, 323, 307,506 r/w 34 IPC and Sec.3 (tX|(s) 3^{(2) (Va)} of SCs &^{STs (POA)}

¶18

Amendment Act, 201 5 in so far as Petitioner/Accused No.2 is concerned including arrest of the Petitioner/Accused No.2,^pending disposal of the main petition.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kadaru Prabhakar Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 .

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.211O OF 2022

¶23

QBDERi

¶24

No representation on petitioner's side on call. 2. The present Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is hied seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.2O5 of 2O2l of Veenavanka Police Station, Karimnagar District. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid and, therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous. 4. Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition, in case the cause survives. 5. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-I.NAGA^LAKSHMI I DEPUTY REGTSTRAR I //TRUE^COPY// sEcrroS^OFFICER Iffi ;$,$ffi^{pf ruff;iliu'lf} ';:#';mxsanaa 6. One^{SPare CoPY} gbr A\t\I-

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2310912022

o r iL
,.F
2
!.!
s
i I
s
o <br>u-

¶29

ORDER

¶30

CRL.P.No.2110 of 2022

¶31

DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶32

,/,

Motam Raghu v. State of Telangana of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Motam Raghu v. State of Telangana of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. v. Vijayasaradhi Vs The State of Telangana

Kalakuntla Jaipal Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Palle Suguna Vs The State of Telangana

M.Venkataiah Vs The State of Telangana

Nethi Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

A R Raja Sekhar Vs The State of Telangana and Another