Dismissed

Mohammed Abdul Khader v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Jul 2022CRLP/1922/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana, in Criminal Petition No. 1922 of 2022, granted permission to the accused to withdraw his petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; the criminal petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Mohammed Abdul Khader Vs the State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:^'1922 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

IVIOHAMMED ABDUL KHADER, S/o. Late. Md. Sharif, Aged about 51 years, Occ.Pvt Employee, R/o. H. No. 94-32121A, Lions Town Colony, Hasmathpet, Alwal. Presently residing at H. No. 114-748, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through it's Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENT No. 1/COMPLAINANT

¶13

SMT. WAJIDA AKHTARI BEGUM, Wo. Md. Abdul Khader, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Business R/o. H. No. 9-4-32121A, Lions Town Colony, Near St. mary's High School, Hasmathpet, Old Bowenpally, Alwal.

¶14

...RESPONOENT No.2/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased topleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused in C.C. No. 2243 of 2021 on the file of the learned XXlll. Metropolitan Magistrate, at Medchal, Cyberabad, in the interest of^justice.

¶16

l.A. NO: l OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further^proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused in^C.C. No. 2243 of 2021 on the file of the learned XXlll. Metropolitan Magistrate,^at Medchal, Cyberabad.

¶18

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri H SUDHAKARA RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeare for the Respondent No. 2.

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

/ ,//

¶22

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶23

CRIMTNAL PETITION No.t922 of 2022

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This Criminai petition under Sectio n 482 Cr.p.C. is liled seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner/Accused in c.c.No.2243 of 2O2l that stood pending on the file of the Court of XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchai, Cyberabad District.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused seeks permission of this court not to press the criminal petition. J Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶28

. N. RAJ PAL ASSISTANT REGI RAR //TRUE COPY//

¶29

To,

¶30

SECTION FFICER

¶31

The XXlll Metropolitan Magistrate, at Medchal Cyberabad.

¶32

The Station House Officer, Alwal police Station, Cyberabad.

¶33

Two CC to Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶34

One CC to SRt H. SUDHAKARA RAO Advocate [OpUC]

¶35

Two CD Copies.

¶36

One Spare Copy

I \

HIGH COURT

DATED:1910712022

E STAI-
1 < 1,.: .
.',.
,t
2 g [lJB ?u? \l_',
* i{
'Jj.lj:11

¶41

ORDER

¶42

CRLP.No.1922 of 2022

¶43

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶44

Mohammed Abdul Khader v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Abdul Khader v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Perni Aneesha Vs The State of Telangana

M. Sandhya Reddy and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

K. Chenchurami Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Ediga Anjaneyulu Goud (A-1) Vs Smt. Anitha

Mohammed Abdul Khader Vs Wajida Akhtari Begum

Smt. Kommu Anuradha Vs The State of Telangana and another