Dismissed

Perni Aneesha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Jul 2022CRLP/1740/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Crl.Petition No. 1740 of 2022, the High Court dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings because the petitioner voluntarily withdrew the criminal petition based on counsel's advice, and the cause of action no longer survived.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the criminal petition granted; main petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty to move fresh application granted pending cause.

Perni Aneesha Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY. THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1740 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Perni Aneesha, D/o.Perni Suresh Kumar, Aged about 25.. years, Occ. Private Employee, R:/o. H.No. 16-31-H-380/301 , Anusha Apartment, 6* phase, Opp. Vijetha Super Market, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PET]TIONERYACCUSED NO.3

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of

¶12

Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶13

Vijja Ravi Kumar, S/o. V.Buchiramulu, Age. 35 years, Occ. Reserve lnspector of Police, R/o. Oakwood Apartment, Flat No.102, Raghavendra Colony, Serilingampallv'Rang Reddy District

¶14

...RESpoNDENT/coMpLAlNANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings of Cr.No.O3 of 2021 of PS. Narsingi, Cybarabad, against the petitioner/Accused No.3 herein and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Ct.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No.03 oI 2021 of P.S. Narsingi, Cybarabad, against the petitio ner/Accused No.3, pending the final disposal of the main Crl.Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶18

This Petition comrng on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sai Vikas, advocate for SRI V.RAJENDER RAO, (5353) Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶19

The Court made the following. ORDER

¶20

THE HON'B,LE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUIIIAT,ATHA CIIIMINAL PETITION No.174O OF 2O2r'.

¶21

ORD[)R

¶22

Seeking to quash the proceedings that are pending zLgainst the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.3, in Crime No.O3 of 2O2l of Narsingi Police Station. Cyberabad, the present criminal petition is frled.

¶23

Sri Sai Vikas, learned counsel representing Sri V. Rajender Rao, learned counsel on record for the petitioner, submits that the criminal petition has become infrlrctuous, as charge sheet is filed. He seeks permission

¶24

to u'ithdrau the criminal petition.

¶25

A memo to that effect is also on record.

¶26

Permission accorded.

¶27

The criminal petition is dismissed as n ithdrarvn

¶28

Libe 'rt1, IS granted to the petitioner to move a lresh application in case cause survives.

¶29

Pending miscellaneous applications, ir' any, shall

¶30

stand closed.

¶31

DEPUf$/RmiEf;iil //rRuEcopy// C#_ SECTION OFFICER

¶32

¶33

The XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

¶34

The Station House Officer, Police Station, Narsingi.

¶35

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT)

¶36

One CC to Sri V.Rajender Rao, (5353) Advocate (OPUCT) ! I*o^{CD Copies} A-.--__--

HIGH COURT

DATED:1810712O22

1ea{i
12 rq,,:

ORDER

CRLP.No.1740 ol 2022

THE CRL P. IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN.

¶43

<br>t )
))*

Perni Aneesha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perni Aneesha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Shaluddin Siddique Vs State of Telangana and 8 Others

Shaik Fathima , Shaik Pathima Begum Vs The State of Telangana

Kanaparthy Shyam Sunder Vs The State of Telangana

M. Sandhya Reddy and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

K. Chenchurami Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Madadi Mounika Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and another