Partly allowed

Magilla palli Adhinarayana v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Jan 2022CRLP/179/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a criminal petition for quashing proceedings. Rejecting the request to quash, the Court held the allegations were general and triable. However, granting partial relief, it dispensed with the personal appearance of the accused accused Nos. 2 and 3 for the time being.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of proceedings rejected. Relief to dispense with personal appearance of accused Nos. 2 and 3 granted pending further orders.

Magilla palli Adhinarayana Vs State of Telangana — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 179 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Magilla palli Adhinarayana, S/o. Laxmaiah,

¶9

Smt. Magilla palli Chandravathi, W/o. Adhinarayana,

¶10

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 & 3

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt. Suma Sindhu Bysani, W/o. Ivl. Partha Saradhi, D/o. Suryan Narayana Gu,ta'

¶14

...RESP.NDENTS

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the Criminal Proceedings initiated against the Petitioners/Accused nos.2 and 3 in C.C. No.2970 o'f 2021 on the file of Special [/agistrate of Frrst Class Prohibition and Excise Offences Court at Sangareddy for the offences Under Sec. 498-(A) l.P,C., and sec. 3 and 4 of D.P. Act

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the I\rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Coud may be pleased to dispense with in filling of the certified copy of in C.C. No.2970 of 2021 on the file Special Magistrate of First Class Prohibition and Excise Offences Court at Sangareddy

¶18

l.A. NO: 2OF 2022

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including personal appearance of the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 and 3 in C.C. No. 2970 o't 2021 on the file of Special Magistrate of First Class Prohibition and Excise Offences Court at Sangareddy, pending disposal of the Quash Proceedings

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Md. ANWAR, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 not appeared either in^person or by Advocate.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

I I

¶23

THE HO] TOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN}

¶24

CR; MINAL PETITI^{ON No. t79 0F 2022}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Crimi ral Petition^{is filed underSection 482 Cr'P'C} '^to quash the proct^{edings in C.C.No'2970of 2021} '^{pendingon the} file of Special^{I\ agistrate of First Prohibition& ExciseOffences} Court at Sangar:ddy^{District. The petitioners hereinare Accused} Nos.2 ancl 3^{in the said CC' The offences allegedagainstthem} are under^{Secti rns 498-Aof IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry} Prohibition Act,^1965.

¶27

2, Hear d the learned^{counsel for the petitioners and the} learned Public^{I rosecutor. Perusedthe record'}

¶28

Leareed counsel^{for the petitionersthoughraised} several^grount [s and^{contentions seeking toquash the} proceedingsin].C'No.2gToof2o2l,heisrestrictinghisreliefto dispense with the^{presenceof the petitionersherein/Accused} Nos.2 and 3.

¶29

The petitioners^{herein are aged parents ofA-1} respectively.^{T1 Le allegationsagainst the petitioners hereinare} general in natr tre and^{they are triable issues' Therefore' this} Court is not^{in,:iinedto quash the proceedingsin C C No'297Oof} 202 1 against tl^{e petitionersherein.}

¶30

Corsidering the^{above said submissionsand also the} fact that the^c isputes^{between A- 1 and the 2n(l respondentare} matrimonial^d isputes,^{this CriminalPetition isdisposed of}

¶31

¶32

dispensing \r,ith the presence of petitioners herein/A-2 and A-3 in C.C.No.297O of 2021 , pending on the file of Special Magistrate of First Prohibition & Excise Offences Court at Sangareddy District. However, petitioners herein shall appear before the Court below as and when their presence is required.

¶33

llsc_e]laneous^{Peti!i9-19.pen-{rng_L{gly.} "!d!;lg!ggg"ed._

¶34

i I i

¶35

,TRUE COPY//

¶36

Sd/.L.SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶37

SECTION OFFICER

¶38

¶39

The Special Judicial^{Magistrate of First class, Prohibition and Exciseoffences,} Sanoareddv. Sanqareddy^District.

¶40

ihe"Station Hous5 Offic6r,^{Ramchandrapuram Police Station,} Ramchand rapuram,^{SangareddyDislrict} -

¶41

S. fwo CCs io the^{puU6c piosecutor,High Court for the State of Telangana,} Hvderabad^(OUT)

¶42

+. Ohe CC to Sri Md.^{Anwar, Advocate (OPUC)}

¶43

Two CD CoPies

¶44

One Spare CopY

HIGH COURT

DATED:061o112022

ORDER

CRLP.No.179 ot 2022

01 Fil 2822

DISPOSING OF THE CF L.P,

¶52

./')
-#,
(--/
(, L2--

Magilla palli Adhinarayana v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Magilla palli Adhinarayana v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eruku HariShankar Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Noorjahan Mohanma Hanif Sayyad Vs The State of Telangana

Kotha Janardhan Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Chelikanti Raja Gopal Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Ronak Ashok Raysoni and 3 others Vs State of Telangana and another

Uppu Kumaraswamy Vs State of Telangana