Dismissed
Garepally Rajesham, Nizamabad Dt. v. State, Rep. by Its P.P., Hyd and 8 Othrs
Telangana HCCRLP/16289/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 16289 OF 2014
Between:
Garepally Rajesham,
...PETITIONER
AND
1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. 2. Sangraju,
...RESP.NDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire records in Crl.M.P.No. 15112014 in C.C.No. 189412005 pending on the file of the Learned lll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Range Reddy District and set aside the orders passed on 10.10.2014 in Crl.M.P.No.151l2O14 in C.C.No.1894l2OO5 on the file of Learned lll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad.
CRLPMP. NO: 17511 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in respect of C.C.No.1894/2005 pending on the file of lll Metropolitan [/agistrate, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above criminal petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GOPALA KRISHNA KALANIDHI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and the Respondent No.2 tog none appears.
The Court made the following: ORDER
IIOYI]LI.], SRI .IUS'I'ICF] A. SANl'TIOSII RI,]DDY
(IRIMINAL PEI'I]'ION No. 16289 of 2014
OR,D},R:
'l'his Crinrinal Petition is filed to quaslr thc proceedings dated l0-10-2014 in Crl.M.P. No. l5l of 2014 in C.(1. No. 1894 of 2005 on the file of U Metropolitarr Magistrate, Cyberabad.
No representation for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Public Prosccutor submittcd that C.C. No. 1894 of 2005 was disposed of on 08-12-2017.
While recording the submission of learned Assistant I'ublic Prosecutor, the crirninal petition is dismissed as in lructuous
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendirrg in this criminal
pctition, shall stand c loscd.
Sd/.G.S ESHA ASSISTANTR TRAR //TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To
'1 . The lll Metropolitan Magistrate, CyPerabad,Ranga Reddy District ^ . . z. ri " Si"tioii Houseoffidei,upriat 'p s , Cvberabad' Ranga Redrly District' ; i;; bE; b tn"proti" prosebltor'HighCourt for the state of relangana' Hvderabad(OUT) 4. ir;;"aC;; d;cJpataKrishna Kalanidhi, Advocate(oPUc)
Kj
HIGH COURT
DATED:2110712022
4r $? Nll
ORDER
CRLP.No.16289of 2014
DISMISSING THE CRL.P.AS INFRUCTUOUS,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for quashing proceedings should be allowed or dismissed.
Garepally Rajesham
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court