Dismissed

Bachu Ratnakar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Mar 2022CRLP/1448/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition seeking to quash proceedings against accused persons. The investigation was completed and the charge sheet filed; thus, the petition was held infructuous with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet.

Bachu Ratnakar Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

THURSDAY ,rHE^{rHIRD DAY oI} l44B9H TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYTWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K'LAKSHMAN}

¶5

CRIM INAL^{PETITIONNO:1448 oF 2021}

¶6

Between:""'il ""'il^"

¶7

Between:""'il ""'il^" occ Asricurture'^R/o ?::l:r5i,0iil,il^{R5r"fffi :it",l8io1,#r[?ars'}

¶8

'^{l:','*:l' +flf% [J"ft,;if,1:sfllfi:! 69?,?",:']?t?'""3i'Pllltri]#-i}

¶9

AND

¶10

The State^{of Telangana, rep by its PublicProsecutor' High Courtat} HYderabad.

¶11

Sri Krishna i; Sri Krishna ; p;;1; ;, Rv"^{SwamyMartha' S/o Sailu' Aged.52vears' Occ Revenue}

¶12

' 2. Sri Krishna i; Sri Krishna ; p;;1; ;, Rv"^Swamy R"i;;5il;^{Martha' S/o Sailu' Aged.52} Viii''gil^{S/o Sailu' Aged.52 Sailu' Aged.52} i ; i'iit^{Aged.52 t'/eStg vears' Occ Revenue} riStt^{Occ Revenue} ?f S,36l[igro' * o* t

¶13

Petition^{under Section482 of Cr'P 'C prayinothat in the circumstances} stated^{in the Memorand'#"rt?*otoi c-'inrinurFetition' the High Courtmay} be^{pteased to quashtf-r" fin'rJgi.t"ieOagainst the Petitioner/Accused No 6 and} 7 vide crime^No.'175 "r^{z&b'"oi'islirJioioov^tne sHo' BachannapetPolice} Station, Jangaon^{oistrict tll-oite"i" Ult 420 of IPC and Sec 7(A) of EC Act'}

¶14

t.A. NO: 10^{F 2021}

¶15

Petition^{under Section482 of Cr'P 'C prayino that in the circumstances} stated^{in the Memorandr#'"tti"rrosor cririnar "Petition,theHigh court may} be^{pleased to stay} 'ir"'^f"tn"t Crime^{proceedings No its including ot zozo' dt arrest 2511112020 of thebv} Petitioners/Accused^{No 6} "oⁱ 'ii" the SHO^{Bachannapet p"fTt" dt'ii""' J'nuguonDistrict pendingdisposal of the} Quash^Proceedings'

¶16

ThisPetitionComingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds^{of Criminalpetition and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri PALLE} SRlHARINATH,AdvocateforthePetitionerandthePublicProsecutoronbehalf of the ResPondent^No1'

¶17

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶18

i \

¶19

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1448 of 2O2L

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor placed on record the photo copy of the case details of the subject matter and the same is made as part ofthe record.

¶23

A perusal of the same, it is revealed that the investigation 1S completed in the subject crime, charge sheet is filed and the same is taken on lile vide C.C. No.5OS of 2021.

¶24

In view of the same, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous granting liberty to the petitioners

¶25

to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet itself.

¶26

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶27

criminal petition, shall stand closed.

¶28

ASSrssflNBiS#JAYAI? //TRUE COPYII

¶29

To,

¶30

secrrffioprrcen

¶31

The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Jangaon .

¶32

, I?ff:1r.o. House officer, Bachannapet police Station, Janagaon

¶33

Two CCs to public F re r" n ga na'] a, iiij"*83"."r3?liH^{is h cou rt ror} th e sta te or

¶34

One CC to SRt. pALLE

¶35

: SRIHARINATH Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

s. Two CD Copies o. o"i5;;""6;';y \p

HIGH COURT

DATED:0310312022

ORDER

GRLP.No.1448 of 2021

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.

Bachu Ratnakar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bachu Ratnakar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Ramrakhyani Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Yaseen Nawaz Khan Vs The State of Telangana

Parsaram Pardhasaradhi Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Challagulla Satyanarayana Vs State of Telangana

Velugoti Rama Devi Vs State of Telangana and another

Bachu Ratnakar Vs State of Telagana