Dismissed

Parsaram Pardhasaradhi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Mar 2022CRLP/569/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed petitioners liberty to withdraw Criminal Petition No. 569 of 2022 filed under Section 482 of CrPC challenging FIR registered for cheating and fraud, dismissing the petition as withdrawn upon Public Prosecutor's advice.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the proceedings in the very same Calendar Case after withdrawal is allowed. Criminal Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Parsaram Pardhasaradhi Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAO

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND^{DAY OFI\4ARCH} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO: 569 OF 2022}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Parsaram Pardhasaradhi,^{S/o. P Vijaysaradhr,Aged about 54 years,.Occ'} au.inei., Ri;. H.No. 8-2-231t72,^{Roaii iro. 2, Jubilee Hllls, Hyderabad (Krishna} Group Pardhasarad^hi)

¶8

z F Vilav. Slo. Faiiarim^{Pardhasaradhi,Aged about 24 years, Occ' Business,} R/o. H.l'Jo. 8-2-231t72,^{Road no. 2. Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad}

¶9

r r.^-oiwir,i|. nio, Slo Late^{1. Mohan Rao,Aged about 43 years, OccAdvocate} " nl". 'iIrf no. 2or 2io Floor. Ganesh Siri'Sampada Apqrtment, H No' 8-3ztitlltlOZ, Road no.^{4, Srinvasa Colony, (West),S R Nagar,Ameerpet'} Hyderabad -38

¶10

...pETtrtoNERS/AccusED

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by rts Pubhc Prosec-utor,Hrgh.Court at Hyderabad} for the State of Telingana^{Through Banjara HillsP-oliceStation}

¶13

z :jlaoitlv SanOeeo, 56 J.VenkatEsnwairu^{Ageo 30 yearsocc Naib Tahsildar} - Snr*pdt t ti"oj, lyoeraoao o strrct R/o H No. 9-16-327, Chandragiri V'l'as colon,' Nalgonda

¶14

..RESP.NDENTS

¶15

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of^{Groundsof criminal Petition,the Highcourtmay be pleased} to^quash the FtR No.^{11 of 2022 daled04.01.2022on the file of theBanjara Hills} Police Station, registered^{against the Petitioners U/s.1 86,447} '^{506 R/w 34 I P C '}

¶16

t.A. NO: 1 0F 2022

¶17

PetitionUnderSection4S2otcr.P'cprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the N.4emorandum of^{Groundsof criminal Petition,the Highcourtmay be pleased} to stay all further^{proceedingsin FIRNo. 11 of 2022 daled 04.01 .2022 on the file of} theBanjaraHillsPoliceStation,registeredagainstthePetitionersU/s186,447'506 R/w. 34 l.P.C.^{including the arrest of the Petitioners}

¶18

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri S.CHAKRAPANI,} Advocate for the^{Petitioners andof the Additional Public Prosecutoron behalf of the} Respondent No.1 and of the^{RespondentNo.2 not appeared either in personor by} Advocate

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶20

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.569 OF 2022

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, u,ou1d submit that the Investigating Oflicer in Cr.No.Il of 2022 of Banjara Hil1s Police Station, Hyderabad, has already completed investigation and filed charge sheet and the same was numbered as C.C.No.8l8 of 2022.

¶26

in view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a iiberty to file a fresh petition challenging the proceedings in the very same Calendar Case.

¶27

Granting liberty AS sought, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrar.,,,n. Pending miscellaneous petitions. if anv, sha1l stand closed

¶28

¶29

Sd/.T,KRISHNA KU[/AR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ffii JTL TION'OF FICER

¶30

The lll Additional Chief Metropotitan Maqistrate. Hvderabad

¶31

The Station House Officer, Banjara Hiltipolice St;tion, Hvderabad.

¶32

9 9n" QQ^{to Sri S.Chakrapani.Ailvocate (OpUC)}

¶33

Two CCs to Pubtic Prosecutor, Hlgh Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (our)

¶34

Two CD Copies

¶35

One Spare Copy

Kj.

$lr

HIGH COURT

DArED:0210312022

ORDER

1li'e s14
e l,,t
(
(
oo B j "'
n,z
c

¶42

CRLP.No.569 of 2022

¶43

DISMISSING AS WITHDRAWN CRL.P.

¶44

Parsaram Pardhasaradhi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parsaram Pardhasaradhi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagireddy Ravindar Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Poreddigari Jaya Prakash Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Bandi Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Pramod Ramrakhyani Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Yaseen Nawaz Khan Vs The State of Telangana

Devi Padma Vs State of Telangana