The High Court rejected a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash prior orders. The Court held the petition was infructuous because the underlying trial proceedings had already concluded with acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 1437 OF 2020
Between
Pannala Govardhan Reddy, s/o P.Narsimha Reddy, agedabout47 years, occ. Business r/o Flat No. 306, B Hima SaiPoojitha Apartments,Doctor's Colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER (Defacto Complainant)
AND
...RESPONDENTS (Respondents/Accused Nos.'t to 4)
...RESPONDENT (Petitioner/Complainant)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to allow the quash petition setting aside the orderpassed in Crl.M.P.No.27B2 of 2019 in C.C.No.938 of 2014 dt. 27-1-2O2O on thefile of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court-cum-Vl Addl.JuniorCivil
Judge-cum-Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabadat l-.B.Nagar and to grant such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court deems fit.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.Cpraying that inthe circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,lhe HighCourt may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.938 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Special MobileCourl-cum-Vl Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate,Cybe:rabadat L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the above revision, and to pass such olher order or orders as the Hon'ble Court deenrs fit.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri Kuncha Sunil Goud, Advocate for the Petitioner and the PublicProsecutot (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.5.
The Court made the following: ORDER
l t
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1437 of 2O2O
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is hled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner-de-facto complainant challenging the orders dated 27 .Ol .2O2O in Crl.M.P.No.2782 of 2Ol9 in C.C.No.938 of 2Ol4 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class - Special Mobile Court- Cum - VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, wherein the petition liled by the petitioner under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed.
\
2
petition to quash orders dated 27.O1.2020 in C:t.M.P.No.2782 of 2Ol9 in C.C.No.938 of 2014 is defeated and thereby the criminal petition has become infructuous and liable to be dismissed.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closcd.
SD/.P.F'ADMANABH REDDY AS SISTANT TRAR
I
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 . The Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station,Hyderabad.
E
I I I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2310912022
ORDER
F_L,14 G
o<br><br>'i.9-l
siA-
tii B
n
i$.(t ;
I
o (,/.
G<br>,
CRLP.No.1437 of 2020
DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS INFRUCTUOUS
ed'$ @ W -rtd*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition filed to quash earlier orders is maintainable when the main trial has already resulted in acquittal of the accused.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pannala Govardhan Reddy
Smt. B.Laxmi
S.Narsi Reddy
K.Anji Reddy
S.sanieeva Reddy
The State of Telangana
D. Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
