Dismissed

Pottabathula Shekhar , Chiranjeeni v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Sept 2022CRLP/660/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashal of criminal proceedings. High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous, noting that the investigating agency had completed the investigation and filed a final report referring the case as false.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.

Pottabathula Shekhar , Chiranjeeni Vs The State of… — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^325e 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEfi/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 660 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

Pottabathula Shekhar@ Chiranjeeni, S/o. Laxmaiah,

¶9

Kalluri Narsi Reddy, S/o. Bixa Reddy,

¶10

...PETITIONERS/A1 AND A2

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶13

L.S. Kurella, S/o.Gnanaiah, R./o. H.No.4-53, Laxminagar Colony, Gatkesar, Ranga Reddy District

¶14

...RES'.NDENT.

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash proceedings in Cr.No.330 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Devarakonda at Nalgonda District

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the Cr.No. 330 of 2019 on the file P.S. Devarakonda at Nalgonda District.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

'I'HE lION'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGrIR,JUfl

¶22

CR MINAL PETITION No.66O of 2C2O

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

¶25

This Crrn iral Pctition is filccl under Se:tior1 132 of the Code of Crimir al Procedure by the^pe titioners-acc "rsed Nos.¹ and 2 t<'; cluasl Crime No.330 of 2019 of Der aral< rnda Police Station register :d against them lor the offcnct' undr r St:ctions 504 and 506 o the Indian Penal Codc and S,:ctior .l (1) (r)(s) SC/Sr (POA) Ac:.

¶26

J'herc is ro re presentatior-r on bchalf of lhr: pr'1 itioners - accuscrl Nos. I i nrl 2

¶27

Learned ,lssistant Public Prosccutor has subrnitted lhat subsequent to iling of the crimirral petition, thc' irtr estrgating agenc)' has con pleted entire investigation and filed Iirral report by referring ti .e case as "false" and to that l,:tt-er dated 12.O9.2022 adc ressed by Sub-lnspector of Police, De varakonda Police Staiion t< the I)ublic Prosecutor of the High Corrrt is filed.

¶28

4 . In vierv oJ the abovc submission, since entire investigation is completed a rd case is also closed by referring rlte case as 'false". rhe vcr1 purpose of liling the criminal petitio:-r to quash Crime No.330 c' 2Ol9 of Devarakorrda Police Sratlon is dcleated -\

¶29

¶30

and thereby the criminal petition has become infructuous and

¶31

liable to be dismissed.

¶32

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is dismissed as

¶33

infructuous.

¶34

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,

¶35

shall stand closed.

¶36

sd/-N. GOPAL ASSISTANT R ISTRAR

,TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

The First Class Magistrate at Devarakonda. 2. The Station House Officer, Devarakonda Police Station, Nalgonda District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶42

One CC to Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, Advocate [OPUC]

¶43

Two CD Copies

¶44

One Spare Copy

Kj (

\ \

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

ORDER

CRLP.No.660 of 2020

1:L
<br>I
*i $
,l
N'
a xv!]
s .Fr
,, 4
/
i

¶52

DISMISSING THE CRI- P, AS INFRUCTUOUS,
Q
vl
/$-

Pottabathula Shekhar , Chiranjeeni v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pottabathula Shekhar , Chiranjeeni v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotla Narsimha Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

R. Praveen Kumar , Praveen Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Vasarla Ashok Vs The State of Telangana

Singaraju SomaSekhar, Vs The State of Telangana

Viabhav Tripathi Vs The State of Telangana and another

Kummari Mahesh Vs The State of Telangana and another