National Investigation Agency v. Manik Shaik
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal No.966 of 2012 as infructuous upon the counsel's statement. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were closed.
The High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal No.966 of 2012 as infructuous upon the counsel's statement. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THESTATEOFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE SECONDDAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CRIMINAL APPEALNO:966 OF 2012
Criminal Appeal filedUnder Section 21 of Nationallnvestigation Act 2008 against the Order dated15,09,2012made in Crl.M'P.No.471 of 2012on the file of the Court of thelV AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad
Between:
tlaironat tnvestigationAgency,Chikoti Garden, Begumpet, Hyderabad Rep by Mr. K.Sudarshan -RedOy, Deputy Superintendent of Police, N l'A , Hyderabad'
...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
AND
lvlanik Shaik, S/oKaisuddin Seikh, Native of SadariTola, Village & PostShabazpur' P.S., Kaliyaihak,Malda District,WestBengal State.
...RESPONOENT/PETITIONER/ACCUSEDNO'14
CRL.A. M.P.NO: 2120OF 2012
PetitionunderSectionl5,lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit filedin support of the petition,the Hlgh Court may be pleased lo suspend the bail order dated1 5.09.2012 passed in CrI M P'No 471ol 2012on the file of the lV Addilional MetropolitanSessionsJudge,Hyderabadin Cr'No lol 2012 on the file of the National lnvestigationAgency'Hyderabad'
counsel for the Appellant: sRl. P. VISHNUVARDHAN REDDY
Counsel for theRespondent: NONEAPPEARED
The Court made the following:JUDGMENT
AND
THE IiON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI
CRIMINAL APPEAL No'966 of 2O12
JUDGM (Per the Hon'ble the ChielJuslice Sat'sh Chctulro SlrcLnna)
Learned counsel for the appellant has fairly stated
before this Court that the matter has become infructuous
The criminal aPPea-1 1S accordinglY disPosed of as
infructuous.
The miscellaneous applications pending' if any' shall
stand closed.
SD/
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1 ,giF,,Xi,f*:';lXi:A'""1"r!:Ji:gcrJ'Elt",'iB?S"gJ":R::"|\1il
2
lli?'Xjf
{oPUc)
J, two CD CoPies
4 6ne Spare CoPY
KS
TR 1-
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/0212022
E S'i Ar€
Or
t
)
oo 05 tl,[g 2022 i (,
,t
i
,"1t"
o
lar'..n .1
ORDER
CRLA.No.966 of 20'12
DISPOSING OF THE CRL.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS.
frfr
Is
National Investigation Agency
Mlanik Shaik
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court