Dismissed

Bakaram Amarender Reddy v. Suresh and Another

Telangana HC8 Nov 2022CRLA/220/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Appeal filed by the appellant/complainant against a judgment in C.C. No. 405 of 2019. No party appeared despite notice. The appellant failed to show interest in prosecuting the appeal or providing proof of service. The court dismissed the appeal for default.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Appeal No. 220 of 2021 is dismissed for default. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.

Bakaram Amarender Reddy Vs Suresh and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL No: 220 OF 2021

¶6

Criminal Appeal under Section 372 &378(4) of Cr.P.C against the judgement dated:15-03-2021 in C.C.No.4O512019 on the file of the Court of the I Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District at^{Hasthinapurm.}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bakaram Amarender Reddy, S/o. Anji Reddy, Aged^{25 years,Occ. Business,} Fi/o. H.No.1-52, lmamguda, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy District.}

¶9

..AppellanUComplainant

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . Suresh, S/o. Balraj, Aged 26^years, Occ. Business,^{Ri/o.H.No.5-151 ,} Thukkuguda Villagie, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy District-501 359.}

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court^{of Telangana} at Hyderabad Through SHO P.S.Pahadi Shareef, R.R.^District

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. B RAVINDER REDDY,^Advocate (None Appeared)

¶15

Counsel for the Respondent 2: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HONOTIRABLE DR. JUSTTCE G. RADHA RANI

¶18

CRIMINAL APPBAL N0.220 0F 2021

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

This Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant against the^judgment dated 15.03.2021 in C.C.No.405 of 2019 passed by the Court of I Special Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hastinapuram.

¶21

Wherr the matter was taken up for hearing on 11.10.2022, none appeared on behalf of the appellant and proof of service of notice on respondent No.l was not filed. Hence, the matter was posted under the caption.'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation on behalfofthe appellant

¶22

As the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the

¶23

matter, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed for default.

¶24

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand

¶25

closed.

¶26

Scl/- K. SRINIVASA^RAO JOINT BFGIs_rRAR //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶27

To,

¶28

1 The lspecial^{magistrate,Hasthinapuram,Ranga Reddy District'at} HasthinaPUram

¶29

1. rne Station^{House Officer, PoliceStation PhadiShareef Ranga Reddy} District

¶30

Hlgh^{Court for the State of Telangana' at}

¶31

1. Two CCs^{to the Pllblic Prosecutor'} Hyderabad^{(ouI )} DY, Advocate [oPUc]

¶32

1. One^{CC to Mr' B RAVINDER RED}

¶33

Two^{CD CoPies'} .\

HIGH COURT

Dr.G.R.RJ

DATED:0811112022

ORDER

gf A l'e Or
o'
J 'rr1 '\\ 1$ i:),
\ L) I
),.
t -,}'a 4.

¶39

CRLA.No.220 of 2021

¶40

DlSM|SSlN13 THE CRtMtNAL AppEAL FOR DEFAULT

¶41

ra
_7
1b

Bakaram Amarender Reddy v. Suresh and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bakaram Amarender Reddy v. Suresh and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malipatlollta Panduranga Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Cassandra Mendonca, Mumbai., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

M/s Viswa Bharathi Mutually Aided Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs G. Janaki Ramulu and another

Kota Narasimha Rao and another Vs Kota Venkata Krishna and 5 others

Kammati Rajender Vs Smt. Kammati Vinoda

Mr. Jagmohan Marwah Vs M/s. Equentis Capital Private Limited