The High Court rejected an appeal against a Section 138 NI Act dismissal after counsel submitted the dispute was settled outside court, holding the appeal infructuous.
Criminal Appeal No. 1661 of 2018 dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous pending petitions, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325e I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1661 OF 2018
Criminal Appeal Under Section 378(4) of Crl.P.C against the Judgement daled 4l5l2A1B in CC No.213 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the lV Special lvlagistrate, Hasthrnapuram.
Between:
M/s. Asritha Chit Fund Pvt, Ltd. al 16-2-705110lNB, Malakpet, Hyderabad, rep by Manager, T Madhu Sudhan, S/o Ranganayakulu, aged about 43 years, Hyderabad
...APELLANT/COM PLAINANT
AND
RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
...RESPODENT / RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:SRl VSRMV PRASAD SANAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: None Appeared
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL APPITAL No.1661 of 2OLB
ORDER:
This Criminal appeal is filed by the appellant compiainant lo set aside thejudgment clatcd 04.05.2018 in C.C.No.213 of 2016 passed by learned IV Special Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hasthinapuram, rr,,hcrcin the complaint filed by the petitioner against the respondent-:l<:cuscd under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act \ras dismissed.
As a sequel, thc miscellar-reous l)etitions, pcncling if an1,, shall stand closed.
SD/- CH.VENKATESHWARLU "-' - orFury:SEGlsrRAR i //TRUECOPY// sEc!f,fr oFFrcER i
to'',. ,n" lV Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram' Ranga Reddy' Dist (With , iT3'33.to the Public Prosector' High Court for the stateof Telangana'at a. Hvderabad 6il"cti,isiiVshrt,tv lOUTlPrasadsankar' Advocate(oPUC)
A.-.,-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1211012022
ORDER
CRLA.No.1661 of 2018
1 H E S T4
(
oo 14 FEB 2023 ozI
* -l , //,//
,1c
l>/-.7 {- !'i
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS
t
't\1)/
i
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Appeal should be allowed on the ground that the dispute is settled and cause of action does not survive.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Asritha Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.
S.Sridhar Reddy
The State of Telangana
DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
