Disposed

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited v. Vemula Krishna , Krishnaiah and Another

Telangana HC13 Sept 2022CMA/673/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act against an order granting compensation. The High Court, on reference to Lok Adalat, found the parties settled. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award confirming the Commissioner's order without costs.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed confirming the order of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[³²⁵⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU

¶6

C.M.A. NO: 673 OF 2015

¶7

Appeal under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, against the Order in W.C.No.02 of 2014 (NF) dated 1310712015 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, at Nalgonda.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Reliance General lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Legal l\rlanager, 4rh Floor, Sagar Plaza Abids, Hyderabad.

¶10

...APPELLANT/ O.P.NO.2

¶11

AND

¶12

Vemula Krishna @ Krishnaiah, S/o. Srinu Occ: Cleaner of eicher Van No. AP 24 TC 2448 R/o. Venkatadripalem Village of tvliryalguda Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶13

.....Respondents/ Applicants

¶14

Gottam alkya Prasad, S/o. Sarabandi Rl/o. H.No. 28-628, Sundarnagar, lt4iryalguda Town, Nalgonda District. (Owner of Eicher No.AP 24fC 2448)

¶15

...RESPONDENT/ OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 1

¶16

For the Appellant : SRI V.K.NAIDU, Advocate

¶17

For the Respondent No.1 : SRI C.M.PRAKASH, Advocate

¶18

For the Respondent No.2 : NONE APPEARED

¶19

The Court delivered the following : JUDGMENT

¶20

¶21

THE HON'BLE^{JUSTICE SAMBASWA RAO NAIDU}

¶22

C.M.A. No.^{673 0F 2015}

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

This appeal^{is filed by the appellant/oppositeparty No 2 -} against^the Reliance^{General Insurance Company Limited} respondents^{seeking to set aside the order' dated} 13.07.2015, passed in^{W.C.No.O2/2014by the Commissionerfor Employees} Compensation^{and Deputy Commissionerof Labour- At Nalgonda'} wherein,^{the Courtbelowgranted compensationof Rs'5'85'608/-} in favour^{of respondents- claimants'}

¶25

Heard. Perused^{the record'}

¶26

At request^{of learned counsel for the parties' this} Court^{vide order, dated 24 '06 '2022' has referredthe appealto} Lok Adalat.^{On 26'06 2022, the matter was settled beforethe} Lok Adalat^{and an Award was passed to that effect'}

¶27

In view of^{the above said Award'the appeal is} disposed^{of. Registry is directedto enclose a copy of the Award'} dated^{ZS.OO.ZO22passed by the Lok Adalatto this order'}

¶28

MiscellaneousPetitions,ifany,pendinginthisappealshall

¶29

stand closed.^{There shall be no order as to costs}

¶30

-.-7---

¶31

Sd/.B.S.CHIRANJ VI JOINT REGIS RAR //TRUE^COPY' SECTION^OFFICER

¶32

\ To

¶33

To 1. The Commissioner^{for Workmen's Compensationand DeputyCommissioner} (with records) . -- 2 "i'iruoriiiltrlgonda. 6ri"6Cio^{stivh.Naidu,Advocate [OPUC]} ^. 6;; cc i6^{5ri c nlt pratash,Advocate [oPUc]} 4 Two CD Copies i"'L;rlg^{*iih ; iopvof Lok Adalath Award)} Kj .Sn-

HIGH COURT

DAf ED:1310s12022

ft
./a
<J
*
'r
_r
:, s
1u 3
j-
s= l:
'f-:) }<br>c!
rt
) il

¶38

JUDGMENT

¶39

CMA.No.673 ot 20'15

¶40

DISPOSING OF THE CMA IN TERMS OF L.A.AWARD WITHOUT COSTS.

)/v

Lotr A{qlrh 4.t"xA I

.t>-t.-..i...

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMA,TITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. l.,nder Section l9 of lhe Legol Services Aulhorjties Act. l987 (Centrdl Act)l Date:26- 06-2022

¶45

Present:1. Hon,ble Dr. Justice G.yethirajulu (Former Judge ot erstwhtte Hon,ble High Court o, Andhra^pradesh) 2. Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, Member 3. smt.l(.Mani Deepika, smt.l(.Mani Deepika, Deepika, Advocate, Member

¶46

,.1 3. smt.l(.Mani Deepika, smt.l(.Mani Deepika, Deepika, Member '1HIGH^COLIRT CMA.No.673 ot 2015 LOK^ADALA v (Before the Hon,ble High Court) ol AGAINST tlale oi1

¶47

AGAINST tlale oi1 E.C.No .O2 of 7O 14 NF (On the fite of Commissioner for Emptoyees' Compensation and Deputy Com missioner of Labour: At Natgonda)

¶48

¶49

Between: Retiance GeneraI lnsurance Company Limited l:.qy^{iF Lega[Manager,4th ftoor, Sigarptaza} Abids, Hyddrabad

¶50

....Appellant/0.pNo.Z

¶51

AND

¶52

Vemuta Krishna @ krishnaiah S/o Srinu Aged 23 years, Occ; Cteaner of eicher van No. Ap 24 TC 2448 Rlo Venkatadripatem vittage of Miryatguda Mandat, Natgonda District.

¶53

..... Respondents/Appticants.

¶54

Gottam atkya prasad S/o Sarabandi aged major, I/9^{h.No. 28-528, Sundarnagar,I irya"tguOa} i'o-;, Natgonda District. ( Owner of Eicher no.Ap 24 TC Z44B )

¶55

.....Respondent/Opposite party No.1.

¶56

AWARD

¶57

This is an appeat fited by the appettant/ lnsurance Company. 2. The Learned Counsel for the Appettant/lnsrrrn." Corpuny represented that the lnsurance Company is withdrawing the appeat fil; by ir.

O,rna,t'wl,

The said representation^{is recordedand the appealis dismissedas withdrawn,} confirmjng the order of the^{Commissionerfor Emptoyees' CompensaLionand} Deputy Commissjoner of Labour at^{Natgonda.The amount} if^{any remaining} unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be^{paid by} the^{lnsuranceCompanywithinone} month from the date of receipt of the award, along with^interest.

¶64

The Respondent/Petitioner is^permitted to^{withdraw the} entire^amount.

¶65

This Award shatt be subject to^{verification of crossappeal/crossobjection,if} any, fited by the Respondents, otherwise the^{parties are} at^[iberty to^apply for recatl of this Order/Award.

NlI

1 st tr

Court fee paid on this appeal shall be refunded.

¶70

No costs.

¶71

i \

¶72

Fcr Reiilnae Genetal Insutance Co' Ltd'
inc i L-t-: SigIato
Appettant/O. Z
lnsuranc an
fil/d)
CHAI N ER /,lEMBER
/:.S
,'-.<br>(s
Lo( i''"r
|.>&!'

¶73

I
a I
I
I
t
I

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited v. Vemula Krishna , Krishnaiah and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited v. Vemula Krishna , Krishnaiah and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thalluri Krishna Prasad Vs M/s. Sadana Estates

United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs Mohd.Hyder

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs Annepaka Javi Kumar

National Insurance Company Limited, Khammam. Vs Vutukuru Rama Devi and 4 Others

Raliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Reddimalla Srinu and Another

Mula Prasuna Vs The Union Of India