Petitioners seeking to withdraw a contempt case instituted under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience of an order in W.P. No. 52311 of 2017. The High Court granted permission to withdraw.
Permission to withdraw granted; Contempt Case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH coURT FoR THE ST/ er nvoeniJiooFTELANGANA
.T?A;IIF r vvu THoUSAND -.fEVENrH aruo rwerv,,DAYoF ^,4ARCHr,rr,i _
rHE HoNouRAB.. u[,lt.f#J. B.vrJAysEr! REDoy
CON T EMP TCASE N o: BB oF2 018
(Contempt Case Respondents herein for U/:. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Acl to punish rhe wiiful clisobedience of the Orde 18/12/2A17 in WpMp No court dated 52311 or 2017," *, Between: ^";;,;; ",]ol'ri" ''n'
Between:
AND ...PETITIONERS
Smt Suguna, The Tahsildar, I,4arredpally Mandal, Secunderabad
.RESPONDENT
IA NO: F2 18
, ,n"o:Bj;"rTjl,,,,#i::""Jil .r5r of,cpc prayins thar jn rhe circumstances stated I-(espondents r to 3 to reconst.l .the ,Highcourt .may bepleased to ar.ecr irre 1 0 1 1 4s uno iao" ;;,H#;;, li:,X"i:T [l:: :l:XS,:l ;Am::l];: Secunderabad white so ounish them as per ri r"j* "s"i,ij"s t0 and 12 of rhe conrempt of courts Acl for wilifur^drsooeolnc""ot in" in wp Mp No s2311 a inti-i" il;"i;",ixuu "--"L"'01=."0 o,by rhis 2ot7Hon.bre dated i;riri;ll
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Between:
........lmplead Parties/ Proposed Respondents 2 & 3
Application under order 1 Rule'lO of CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lmptead the proposed respondents 2 and 3 as respondents 2 and -3 to the instant contempt case No.88 of 2018 fjled against them under sectrons lO $ lZ of the contempt of courts act for their willful disobedience of the orders passed by thjs Hon'ble High Court in WPlr.4P No.5231 1 of 2017 in WP.No 42185/2017 dated 18.12.2017,
2-
IA OF 01 ection151 of CPC PraYingmaythatin bePthe circumsta nces stated leasedto directthe ionunderS HishCourt anycon struction 1n inthe APPlicataf{ldav il {iledthe re\Nitlr, ssessthe theP etition erstly waYofmal(ing 184.44 sq Yards situatedat ResPo ndentsnot to H.disPo No1 O-1-145an d146 admeasurlng bearing premises Secunderabad estMarredPallY, s:SRIM A K MUKHEED'Advocate Forthe Petitioner
OF 01 IA
Forthe Respondents : GPFORREVENUE
TheCourt made thefollowing: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY CO NTEM PT CASEN o.880F2o18
ORDER:
Mr. M.A.K.Mukheed, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this contempt case.
To
Sd/-A.V,S.S,C ,S,M.SARMA DEPU REGISTRAR /ITRUE COPYI/ SECTION OFFICER
x:
HIGHCOURT
DATED:11/03/2022
ORDER
CC.No.88of 2018
B S t t € o
1
(
v
q n4
ro ? c
oo 25 H: ,'t- i
+
n Dpl-,
CC IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN,
w /\ ^u r.. "" 0
Veerabhasker and 1. Sar Kran
Suguna
Yogita Rana
Chandrakala
B. V. V. Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
