Dismissed

T.Paramesh v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Mar 2022WP/33745/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition by following a common order in a batch of similar cases. It directed the Sub-Registrar to register documents but impose conditions, including endorsements warning of legal risks related to F.T.L. and buffer zones unless ordered by the Supreme Court.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of following a common order; Sub-Registrar directed to register documents with specific endorsements cautioning purchasers of legal risks.

T.Paramesh Vs State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 33745 OF 2021

¶2

ORDER (ORAL):

¶3

Heard both sides and perused the material on record.

¶4

It is submitted by the learned counsel on either side that subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch dated 18.02.2022, as modified by the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.2985 of 2022 and batch, and therefore, keeping the matter pending will not serve any purpose, as such, the same may be disposed of in terms thereof.

¶5

This Court passed interim order in this writ petition directing the respondents to receive, process, register and release the subject document/s. However, conditions were imposed that (a) the petitioner/s is/are not permitted to withdraw the writ petition and (b) registration shall be subject to final result of the writ petition.

¶6

In view of the above, recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel on either side, following the common order dated 18.02.2022 in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch, as modified by the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.2985 of 2022, in terms thereof, this writ petition is disposed of as under, without any order as to costs:

¶7

(A) If the subject document/s has/have already been registered and released pursuant to the interim order;

¶8

(i) the document/s registered by the Sub-Registrar shall be subject to outcome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State Government before the Hon’ble Supreme Court; and

¶9

(ii) in case, it is found that there is any violation of law like plots/lands/structures being sold form part of F.T.L. and Buffer Zone/Plots having less than 30 feet road width access, the Sub Registrar shall make an endorsement

¶10

: 2 :

¶11

informing/cautioning the purchasers that risk is involved in purchase of such plots; such transactions are hit by relevant statutory provisions; that registration of the same is subject to outcome of orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021. To that effect, an endorsement shall be made in the encumbrance record, website etc.

¶12

(B) If the subject document/s is/are not yet registered and released pursuant to the interim order;

¶13

(i) the respondent - Sub-Registrar is directed to register the document of sale, transfer and gift etc., presented for registration by the petitioner/s without reference to the Memo Nos.G2/257/2019 dated 26.08.2020 and 29.12.2020 issued by the respondent-the Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Telangana; Letter No.45/TP/NMC/2019 dated 01.11.2019 issued by the respondent-the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Nizampet to the respondent-the Sub Registrar, Quthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District, and similar letters, if any, issued by the various Municipal Commissioners in the State;

¶14

(ii) the Sub Registrars in the State shall make an endorsement at the reverse side of the first page of the document referred in direction No.(i) that registration so done is subject to outcome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State Government before the Hon’ble Supreme Court; and

¶15

(iii) in case, it is found that there is any violation of law like plots/lands/structures being sold form part of F.T.L. and Buffer Zone/Plots having less than 30 feet road width access, the Sub Registrar shall make an endorsement informing/cautioning the purchasers that risk is involved in purchase of such plots; such transactions are hit by relevant statutory provisions; that registration of the same is subject to outcome of orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021. To that effect, an endorsement shall be made on the reverse side of the first/second page of the document and also in the encumbrance record, website etc.

¶16

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶17

writ petition stand closed.

¶18

______________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J

¶19

11.03.2022 sha/kl

T.Paramesh v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Paramesh v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Penta Thirupathi Vs The State of Telangana

V. Sita Vs The State of Telangana

G. Swamy Vs The State of Telangana

T. Veera Bhasker Vs The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary

Kodati Venu Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Aenugu Raghuma Reddy and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others