The Telangana High Court disposed of a contempt case alleging violation of its previous order. The court accepted the respondents' counter-affidavit showing compliance via a Memo dated 12.12.2019 and closed the case without penalizing them.
Petition for contempt dismissed; case closed without penalty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
ONTE PTC E NO:769 OF
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 16.09.2019 in W.P.No.19918 of 2019.
Between:
AND
Gopuraju Ramesh, S/o.Late Mogili, Age 34 yrs, Fl/o.H.No.1-'l , Sirsapalle, Huzurabad mandal' Karimnagar ...pETrroNER
(R4 name ICT amended as per court oder tt 23.12.2O22 in lA No. 1 of 2021 in cc 769 ot 20211
...REspoNDENrs
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. SOORAM SANDHYA RANI
Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE.(TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHE)ER I.iUMAR
:ONTEMPT CASE No.759 OF 2O2l
ORDER:
This cor.t.empt case is hled alleging violation o{ the order dated 16.09.2 [t19 passed by this Court in W.p.],lo.1991g of 2019, wherein t-his Court directed respondent No.4 ,h,:rein, who is respondent \o.4 herein, to take steps against the p1:'icvrnce of the petitioner [r5, <:onsidering his apptication r]ated ).t.O8.2Olg within a peric J 12 weeks from the date of r.eceipt rl I copy of the order.
2
the petitioner to take appropriate steps, if the petitioner is
otherwise aggrieved by the I emo, dated 12.12.2O19.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this contempt
case shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
sd/- T. sRtNtyAs DEPUTY REGISTRAR sEcfloN#FrcER
To,
HIGH COURT
DAT[:D:',2311212022
/,.1 * 1r'ii s r r(-
'':('
l.
{_
j
i 1 6 lr{il
,. ,I
'i.- ,l:a .: . ,- 1 -
ORDER
CG.tlcr.769 of 2021
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
\o
t'<br>'t ,,/ -)-
<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court was violated of its earlier order directing the respondent Tahsildar to act within 12 weeks.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gopuraju Ramesh
Sri Somesh Kumar
Sri K. Shasfanka
S. B Bql Shalom
Ch. Krishna Chaitanya
Mummini Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
