Contempt Case where petitioners alleged violation of an interim order by cutting trees. The High Court held that since the interim order was not extended, the actions did not constitute contempt. The case was dismissed.
Contempt case dismissed; miscellaneous petitions pending in the case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1229 OF 2022
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish respondents for their intentional, willful and deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble court dated'l 1-03-2016 in WPMP No. 9975 of 2016 in WP No. 7836 of 201 6.
Between:
...PETITIONERYPETITIONERS in WP
AND
(Leave granted to file the present CC against R4 as per the Hon'ble Court Order dtd.29 07.2022 in lA No.1 of 2022 in CC No.1229 of 2022)..
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B RAMULU
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISTION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.l229 OF 2022
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 11.O3.2016 passed b1, this Court in W.P.M.P.No.9975 of 2016 in W.P.No.7836 of 2016 on the ground that on 27.O5.2022, the respondents have removed the existing teakwood trees with the support of more than 1OO police personnel.
/
2
Sd/. CH.VENKATESWARLU DEPUTY GI
//TRUE COPY//
L \ % SECTION OFFICER
To,
PR
J
HIGH COURT
DATED:2311212022
ORDER
CC.No.1229 of 2022
<br>6
q
f, 23 I it ? l
DISMISSING THE CONTEIVTPT C \SF
tA
4
l( \1,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the removal of teakwood trees by respondents on 27.05.2022 amounts to a violation of the interim order dated 11.03.2016.
Whether the allegation of violation sustains when there is no evidence of extension of the interim injunction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yeluvaka Swapna
Yeluvaka Rajeswari
Sri Somesh Kumar
Shri Narsimha Murthy
Shri Manohar
Shri Heria Naik
Mummineni Sudheera Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
