In a contempt case under Sections 10 to 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court accepted the respondents' claim that the earlier order was complied with and rejected the petitioner's challenge vide proceedings dated 09.03.2022.
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge rejection proceedings dated 09.03.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
N/ONDAY.THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 70 OF 2022
Contempt case Under Section 10 to1 2 of Contempt of courts Act topunish the respondents herein for wilfull , disobeying the Order of theHigh Court date 05.01.2021 in W.P. No.46 of 2021.
Between:
Dr. G Balakishan, S/o. Sri Balaiah, aged 45years, Occ. Assistant Professorin the Dept. of Organic Chemistry Telangana University, Dichpally, Nizamabad- 503 322, R/o H.No.11-1-1877/3, N.4arulhinagar, Near Kings Club,Nizamabad - 503 002.
...PETITIONER
AND
..,CONTEI,1NORS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A V SLAXMI
Counsel for the Respondents: S LAKSHMIKANTH
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHINAND KUMAR SHAVITI
CONTE PT CASE No.70 ot 2022
ORDER:
When the molter is loken up for heoring, lhe leorned Stonding Counsel oppeoring for the respondents hod conlended thot the order possed by this Courl hos been complied with ond the cose of the petitioner wos considered ond rejecled vide proceedings doled 09.03.2022.
Leorned counsel oppeoring for the pelilioner hos not dispuled lhe submission mode by lhe leorned Slonding Counsel.
ln view of lhe obove submissions mode by lhe respective porlies, thh Courl is of lhe considered view thot the order possed by thls Court hos been complied with.
Accordingly, the Coniempt Cose is closed. However, the petilioner is given liberly lo chollenge the rejeclion proceedings doted 09.03.2022 in occordonce wilh low if lhe pelitioner is oggrieved. No costs.
Pending miscelloneous pelitions, if ony, sholl stond c,osed.
To,
SO/-M.VIJAY A BHASKAR DEPUTY //TRUE COPY// TGTSTRAR sEcTtoN OFF|CER
1.prof K. Sh,va Shankar, Registrar,Telangana Universjty, Dichpally, Nizamabad -
unrversity, Nizamabad - ,35-rtit:ut'"counciland vice chancelor, Telangana
o. t,ne Spare Copy
MMA .V
HIGH COURT
DATED:14l0312022
ORDER
CC.No.70 of 2022
t.lE SI4
(
c
,.-)
12 f';:L , l), )'t
,l
a-,'/
CLOSING CONTEMPT CASE.
t,n
6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has complied with the court order dated 05.01.2021.
Whether the contempt case should be closed upon claim of compliance.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P. No.46 of 2021Distinguished¶5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. G Balakishan
Prof. K. Shiva Shankar
Prol. D. Ravinder
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Ashinand Kumar Shaviti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
