Disposed

Dr. Dharavath Nagaraju v. Prof. K. Shiva Shankar and another

Telangana HC14 Mar 2022CC/69/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavilli answered a contempt application filed for violation of an order. The respondent submitted compliance with the earlier order was made, which the court accepted. Consequently, the contempt case was closed.

What did the court decide?

Closed the contempt case. Liberty to challenge the rejection of the petitioner's earlier proceedings.

Dr. Dharavath Nagaraju Vs Prof. K. Shiva Shankar and… — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

IMONDAY, THE^{FOURTEENTH DAY OF N4ARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE^{ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI}

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE^{NO: 69 OF 2022}

¶6

ContemptCasefiledUnderSectionsl0tol2ofContemptofCourtsAct to punish the respondents^{hereinfor willfully violating, disobeying the order of} the High Court dated.^{05.01 .2021passed in W.P.No 49 of 2021'}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Dr. Dharavath Nagaraju,^{S/o. Sri. Venkateswarlu'aged 39 years'Occ} Assistant^{proressor,"6bp-urtrlnt'ofoigani"Chemistry,Telangana} UniversitY, Nizamabad^{- 503 322.}

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

Prof. K. Shiva Shankar,^{Registrar,TelanganaUniversity, Dichpally,} Nizamabad^- 503 322.

¶12

Prof . D. Ravinder, Chairman-Executive^{Council and Vice Chancellor,} Telangana University,^{Nizamabad- 503 322.}

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SMT A' V' S' LAXMI}

¶15

Counsel^{for the Respondents: SRI S' LAKSHMI KANTH}

¶16

The Court^{made the following:ORDER}

¶17

THE HON'BI.E SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVITI

¶18

CONTEMPT CASE No.69 of 2022

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

When the motter is token up for heoring, the leorned Slonding Counsel oppeoring for the respondenis hod conlended thol lhe order^possed by lhis Courl hos been complied wilh ond the cose of the pelitioner wos considered ond rejecled vide proceedings doled 09 .03.2022.

¶21

Leorned counsel oppeoring for the pelltioner hos noi diiputed the submission mode by lhe leorned Slonding Counsel.

¶22

ln view of the obove submissions mode by lhe leorned counsel for the respeclive pqriies, this Court is of lhe considered view thol the order possed by lhis Courl hos been complied with.

¶23

Accordingly, the Conlempt Cose is closed. However, the petitioner is given liberty lo chollenge lhe rejection proceedings doied 09.03.2022 in occordonce with tow, if the petitioner is oggfieved. No cosls.

¶24

Pending miscelloneous pelitions. if ony, sholl stond closed.

¶25

¶26

SD/-M.VIJAYA BHYASKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYil db SECTIO.N OFFICER

¶27

To,

¶28

One CC to Smt A. V. S. LAXI,1|, Advocate IOPUCI

¶29

One CC to SRt S. LAKSHIV| KANTH, nOvdcate 1-deUC1

¶30

Two CD Copies

MMK

*y N4A

HIGH COURT

DATED:1410312022

ORDER

CC.No.69 of 2022

E STA I€
(
(v
I 1t)
o
I 25 [.?,1il
<br><br>*
-c 'i

¶38

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE.

¶39

($t ' . \ot1 ?t't [r-'

Dr. Dharavath Nagaraju v. Prof. K. Shiva Shankar and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Dharavath Nagaraju v. Prof. K. Shiva Shankar and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kurmella Sampath Vs Sri Sriramsetti Krishna Adithya

Mareedu Anusha Vs Bellamkonda Veladri and 4 Others

Gundala Narsaiah Vs Sri Sriramsetti Krishna Adithya and 2 Others

Dr. Mohd Jameel Ahmed Vs Prof. K. Shiva Shankar

Dr. Nagaraj Vs Prof. K. Shiva Shankar and Another

Dr. G. Balakishan Vs Prof. K. Shiva Shankar