The High Court closed the Contempt Case (No. 368 of 2020) after finding that the respondents specifically complied with the interim order regarding the petitioners' representation within the prescribed time limit, despite some delay due to district bifurcation.
The Contempt Case is closed; no order with respect to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
rN rHE HIGH.ou*l{3$rthBtsEoF TELANGANA
FRIDAY, THENINTH DAY OF DECEMBER ' 'iilio iuousnND AND TWENTY Two
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEERKUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 368 oF 2020
Contempt CaseU/s. 10 to 12 of Contemptof Courts Act to punish the Resoondents hereinfor violating,disobeying the Ordersof the High Courtdated 28- Og- rO in WPMPNo 40708 of 2016 in WP No329O8of 2016'
Between:
AII Are R/o Suraram VillageMandal: Mahadevpur mandal,Dist. Karimnagar Presently JayashankarBhoopalpallydist.
...Petitioners
AND
(Leave granted to implead R2 as per the Honble Court Order dtd.06.03.2020 in lA No. 1 ot 2020 in CC No.368 of 2020)
...Respondents/Proposed Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR ASSIGNMENT
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLI)SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEI)R KI'MAR ! )o CASE No .368 of 2O:2O
ORDER,:
This C ourt by order dated 2g.09.2016 in
W.P.M.P.No.401'08 of 2016 io W.p.No.329O8 of 2Ot6 passed an interim order d irecting the 2"4 respondent-District C ollecr.or to consider the representation dated 20.O6.2Ot6 submitted by the petitioners in te'ms of the report of the Srh respondenl -Assistant Director dated 01.12.2OO8 and pass appropriate orders in accordance witt law, within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of recei rt of a copy of the said order.
tl-e respondents have takcn ncarly four (Oa) years and they have failed to explain the reasons for such inordinate delay.
Misccllerneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand ckrsed
Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
Njb
-^\
\
I
HIGH COI'RT
MSK,J
DATED:0!111212022
:'::..-
I
l'.
1)
/;
::
C IIN N8
t'l
ORDER
CC.No.36ri oJ 2020
.l Il[ (]ONTEI IPT CASE IS CLOSlrt)
6
(r
tltt\ "Lj
M. Ramesh Reddy and others
Mr. Konduru Shashanka IAS
Mr. Mohd. Abdul Azeem IAS
Mummineni Sudheerkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
