The High Court at Hyderabad disposed of an application for the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by accepting the withdrawal filed by the applicant.
The arbitration application was disposed of as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEUJJAL BHUYAN
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO:96 OF 2017
Between:
M/s AMRITANSHU INFRASTRUCTUREANDMANAGEMENTPVT'LTD '(M/s AiVpll Beigh ConstructionCompany Pvt. Ltd. (BCC), A Joint Venture, throlgh its .onit[,lt"0 d'ttorn"y Ah. LalitKumar Ram Kumai Aggarwal,Age-51years.,S/o Sh' Ram Kumar Lakslrmi ChandAggarwal,having Registered Office at 01, Chirag Colony, Bhatindi Morh, Jammu-180012
...AppLtCANT
AND
...RESP.NDENTS
Application under section1 1(6) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 and scheme of Appointmentof Arbitrators, 2006 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High courtmay be pleased to appointan Arbitrator to resolve thedisputes between the Applicantand the Respondents arising out of clauseNo. 27 of works contract,dt: 18.06.2012and Pass such , other order or orders maydeem fit and proper in the circumstancesof the case. I
This application comingon for hearing, upon perusingthe Application a d n, affidavit filed in supportthereof and upon hearingthe argumentsof sri Prav Advocate representingMr.Karan Talwar, Advocatefor the applicantand of Ms.Nafisa representingSri.s.SrinivasaReddy,Advocatefor RespondentNo.1.
The Court made the following:ORDER
1
\
THEHON'ELES@
ARBITRATION APPLI CATION No.96oF 20L7
ORDER:
Heard Mr.l'ravcen)learned counsel appearingon be half of Mr. KaranTalwar' learnerl counsel for the applicirntand Ms.Na-fisa, learnerl<:ounscl appearing on behalf of Mr'S'Srinivas Reddy, learnedcounsel for the respondent'
2 Learned counselfor the applicant, on instructions from the applicant,would like towithdraw thepresentarbitration application.
3 In view ofabove,this arbitration application is disposedol on withdrawa].No order as to costs'
Sd/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JOINTREGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY'
SECTI OFFICER
To I . One CC to Sri Karan Talwar' Advocate (OPUC)-. . ^., 2. il; CCi6 sri s.stlniursaReddv, Advocate(oPUC) a4. .Two OneCD SPareCoPiesCoPY Kj
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010412022
t.'
a)
f-
Ll- f
ORDER
ARBITRATION APPLICATIONNo.96 of 2017
DISPOSING THE ARBITRATIONAPPLICATION AS WITHDRAWN.
)-).--
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Amritanshu Infrastructure and Management Pvt. Ltd. (M/s Aione Beigh Construction Company Pvt. Ltd.
M/s IVRCL Limited
Ujjal Bhuyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
