High Court at Hyderabad dismissed common writ petitions as withdrawn by the applicant. No order as to costs.
Judgment dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO
THURSDAY. THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WP(TR) NO.5 077 0F 2017
Between:
K. Ravindra Naik, S/o. Ramulu Naik, agedaboul27 years, P.c . No. 4379,Police Station tr,4iyapur Traffic, Hyderabad,R/o. H.No. 6-47l1lAl4'Venkatad rinagar, Chandanagar, Hyderabad.
...AppLtcANT
AND
...REspoNDENTs
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased to call for the records relating tothe impugned charge Memo,bearing Rc.No. O4IPR-4lCybl2015, dated 30-4-2015and itsconnected Rc No13/PR- 4ffAajorlcybl2o14-15, dated 27-6-2015issued by the 1st respondentand quash or set-aslde the same as beingillegal, arbitraryand subversiveof Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution withall consequentialbenefits
WVMP(TR
NO:"1069 OF 2017:
Between:
AND
K. Ravindra Naik, S/o. RamuluNaik, aged about 27 years, P c '.No.4379'Police station Miyapur'Traffic, Hyderabad,R/o.H.No.6-47111N4, Venkatadrrnagar, chandanagar, Hyderabad.
...REspoNDENT/AppLrcANT
Petition under Section151 CPC praylngthat in the circumstancesstatedin theaffidavitfiledinSupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoVacate the interim orders dt.30.10.2015in O.A. No.6146 of 2015'
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI A. TIRUPATHIGOUO Counsel for Respondents:GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WP(TR) Nos. 5077 of 2Ol7
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel for thepetitioner intends tou ithdrau' the u,rit pc-tition. A letter dated 09.07.202 i to theabovesaid effect is placed on the record of this Court.
Having regard to the desire expressed by thepetitioner, through his counsel, the writpetitions is dismissedas withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneouspetitions, if any,pending in the
writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/-T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE CoPy//
L/--
sEcTtoN oFFtcER
To,
MP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1510712021
COMMON ORDER
WP(TR).No.5077 of 2017
.:, DfAr
6'
{
-)
or) 03 AUG202I
t:<br>at
z i')
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
?pY
K. Ravindra Naik
Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
